Hamstring tendon autografts do not show complete graft maturity 6 months postoperatively after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ methods
Austria
Female
Hamstring Tendons
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Transplantation, Autologous
Wound Healing
/ physiology
ACL reconstruction
Graft healing
Hamstring tendon
MRI
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
02
04
2018
accepted:
22
06
2018
pubmed:
17
7
2018
medline:
13
4
2019
entrez:
16
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this prospective, double-center cohort study, we aim to assess how the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially varies between a group of patients with anatomic ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring grafts 6 months postoperatively and a healthy ACL control group, and how MRI-based graft signal intensity is related to knee laxity. Sixty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft were prospectively invited to participate in this study, and they were evaluated with MRI after 6 months of follow-up. 50 patients with an MRI of their healthy ACL (Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland) and 12 patients of their contralateral healthy knee (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria) served as the control group. To evaluate graft maturity, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured in three regions of interest (ROIs) of the proximal, mid-substance and distal ACL graft and the healthy ACL. KT-1000 findings were obtained 6 months postoperatively in the ACL reconstruction group. Statistical analysis was independently performed to outline the differences in the two groups regarding ACL intensity and the correlation between SNQ and KT-1000 values. There was a significant difference in the mean SNQ between the reconstructed ACL grafts and the healthy ACLs in the proximal and mid-substance regions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004). The distal region of the reconstructed ACL showed a mean SNQ similar to the native ACL (n.s). Patients with a KT-1000 between 0 and 1 mm showed a mean SNQ of 0.1; however, a poor correlation was found between the mean SNQ and KT-1000 findings, probably due to the small sample size of patients with higher laxity. After 6 months of follow-up, hamstring tendon autografts for anatomic ACL reconstruction do not show equal MRI signal intensity compared to a healthy ACL and should therefore be considered immature or at least not completely healed even if clinical laxity measurement provides good results. However, in the case of a competitive athlete, who is clinically stable and wants to return to sports at 6 months, performing an MRI to confirm the stage of graft healing might be an option. Prospective, comparative study II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30008057
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5033-0
pii: 10.1007/s00167-018-5033-0
pmc: PMC6510818
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
130-136Références
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;28(1):124-30
pubmed: 10653557
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):620-6
pubmed: 11573921
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):689-98
pubmed: 11734478
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):751-61
pubmed: 11734489
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):375-85
pubmed: 17622966
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Mar;16(3):224-31
pubmed: 18183368
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1299-306
pubmed: 21293848
J Biomech. 2011 Nov 10;44(16):2843-6
pubmed: 21962290
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):5-47
pubmed: 22105976
Clin Sports Med. 2013 Jan;32(1):111-26
pubmed: 23177466
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):979-86
pubmed: 23740328
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1002-8
pubmed: 24474586
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):661-8
pubmed: 25223969
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan;24(1):169-75
pubmed: 25288337
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1829-1836
pubmed: 28402758
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3048-3054
pubmed: 29574546
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Mar;66(3):344-52
pubmed: 6699049
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995;114(2):72-5
pubmed: 7734236
Arthroscopy. 1998 Mar;14(2):197-205
pubmed: 9531133