A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
/ methods
Analgesics, Opioid
/ therapeutic use
Anesthetics, Local
/ administration & dosage
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Double-Blind Method
Female
Femoral Nerve
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morphine
/ therapeutic use
Nerve Block
/ methods
Pain Management
/ methods
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
/ drug therapy
Prospective Studies
Quadriceps Muscle
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
analgesia
nerve block
total knee arthroplasty
Journal
Singapore medical journal
ISSN: 2737-5935
Titre abrégé: Singapore Med J
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0404516
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
17
7
2018
medline:
23
10
2019
entrez:
17
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adductor canal block (ACB) is hypothesised to provide superior analgesia to femoral nerve block (FNB) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while preserving quadriceps strength. 30 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to receive either ACB or FNB. Baseline tests of quadriceps strength were performed. Ultrasound-guided blocks with 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine were administered before induction of general anaesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia (morphine) was prescribed for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome of this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was morphine consumption (mean ± standard deviation) in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were pain scores using a numeric rating scale (median and interquartile range [IQR]), quadriceps strength (% of baseline) and functional outcomes at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in morphine consumption at 24 hours between the ACB and FNB groups (21 ± 11 mg vs. 20 ± 12 mg; p = 0.85). No statistically significant differences were observed between the ACB and FNB groups in pain scores at 24 hours (at rest: 0 [IQR 0-2] vs. 0 [IQR 0-2]; on movement: 5 [IQR 4-8] vs. 5 [IQR 3-8]) and quadriceps strength (24 hours: 28.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.8% ± 19.6% of baseline; 48 hours: 31.5 ± 23.1% vs. 33.7% ± 20.1% of baseline). There were also no statistically significant differences in functional outcomes and length of stay. We found no statistically significant differences in analgesic effects, quadriceps strength or functional recovery postoperatively between ACB and FNB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30009316
pii: j60/3/145
doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018082
pmc: PMC6441689
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Anesthetics, Local
0
Morphine
76I7G6D29C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145-149Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.
Références
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):404-11
pubmed: 21502865
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):93-7
pubmed: 9661553
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):139-44
pubmed: 11915059
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719
pubmed: 27685346
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32
pubmed: 24121608
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):442-3
pubmed: 25140514
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jan;55(1):14-9
pubmed: 21039357
Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):551-63
pubmed: 24534855
Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4
pubmed: 20889937
Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):774-81
pubmed: 21394001
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):67-72
pubmed: 17196495
J Orthop Res. 2003 Sep;21(5):775-9
pubmed: 12919862
PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9
pubmed: 21570036
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1047-53
pubmed: 15866968
Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):540-50
pubmed: 24401769
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Mar;77(2):250-3
pubmed: 7706340
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):253-4
pubmed: 24747312
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5
pubmed: 23788068
Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15
pubmed: 23241723
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):723-727
pubmed: 27662067
Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62
pubmed: 20966667
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999 Jun;70(2):113-9
pubmed: 10380242
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64
pubmed: 22221014
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jul;38(7):410-7
pubmed: 18591756
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Sep;(143):194-9
pubmed: 509826
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Dec;48(11):1102-8
pubmed: 11744586