Gait speed and survival of older surgical patient with cancer: Prediction after machine learning.
Cancer
Decision tree
Gait speed
Machine learning
Predictive analytics
Survival
TUG
Journal
Journal of geriatric oncology
ISSN: 1879-4076
Titre abrégé: J Geriatr Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101534770
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
03
04
2018
revised:
07
06
2018
accepted:
27
06
2018
pubmed:
19
7
2018
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
19
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gait speed in older patients with cancer is associated with mortality risk. One approach to assess gait speed is with the 'Timed Up and Go' (TUG) test. We utilized machine learning algorithms to automatically predict the results of the TUG tests and its association with survival, using patient-generated responses. A decision tree classifier was trained based on functional status data, obtained from preoperative geriatric assessment, and TUG test performance of older patients with cancer. The functional status data were used as input features to the decision tree, and the actual TUG data was used as ground truth labels. The decision tree was constructed to assign each patient to one of three categories: "TUG < 10 s", "TUG ≥ 10 s", and "uncertain." In total, 1901 patients (49% women) with a mean age of 80 years were assessed. The most commonly performed operations were urologic, colorectal, and head and neck. The machine learning algorithm identified three features (cane/walker use, ability to walk outside, and ability to perform housework), in predicting TUG results with the decision tree classifier. The overall accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the prediction were 78%, 90%, and 66%, respectively. Furthermore, survival rates in each predicted TUG category differed by approximately 1% from the survival rates obtained by categorizing the patients based on their actual TUG results. Machine learning algorithms can accurately predict the gait speed of older patients with cancer, based on their response to questions addressing other aspects of functional status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30017733
pii: S1879-4068(18)30136-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.06.012
pmc: PMC6827429
mid: NIHMS1051894
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120-125Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):e437-44
pubmed: 23026829
Cancer. 2005 Nov 1;104(9):1998-2005
pubmed: 16206252
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2131-8
pubmed: 23583345
Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):646-55
pubmed: 16649889
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;15(11):1021-7
pubmed: 11113982
Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Dec;12(4):261-74
pubmed: 26779363
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1829-34
pubmed: 22508806
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1451-4
pubmed: 14511167
Age Ageing. 2008 Jul;37(4):442-8
pubmed: 18515291
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 Dec;31(12):721-7
pubmed: 6418786
BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jan 12;7:1
pubmed: 17222340
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Feb;15(2):172-179
pubmed: 28188187
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):582-8; discussion 588-90
pubmed: 23979272
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;29(2):64-8
pubmed: 16914068
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 10;171(18):1655-61
pubmed: 21987195
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Sep;60(9):1681-6
pubmed: 22985141
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e86863
pubmed: 24475186
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3457-65
pubmed: 21810685
Phys Ther. 2000 Sep;80(9):896-903
pubmed: 10960937
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;14(10):858-65
pubmed: 10521885
Age Ageing. 2003 May;32(3):315-20
pubmed: 12720619