Dose-Dependent Inhibitory Effects of Cilostazol on Delayed Cerebral Infarction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cerebral Infarction
/ diagnostic imaging
Cilostazol
/ therapeutic use
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
/ complications
Time Factors
Cerebral infarction
Cerebral vasospasm
Cilostazol
Delayed cerebral ischemia
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Tenascin-C
Journal
Translational stroke research
ISSN: 1868-601X
Titre abrégé: Transl Stroke Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101517297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
accepted:
16
07
2018
revised:
24
06
2018
pubmed:
24
7
2018
medline:
17
1
2020
entrez:
24
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cilostazol is a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type III that downregulates tenascin-C (TNC), a matricellular protein, which may cause delayed cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The authors increased the dosage and evaluated the dose-dependent effects of cilostazol on delayed cerebral infarction and outcomes in SAH patients. This was a retrospective cohort study in a single center. One hundred fifty-six consecutive SAH patients including 67 patients of admission World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades IV-V who underwent aneurysmal obliteration within 48 h post-SAH from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Cilostazol (0 to 300 mg/day) was administered from 1-day post-clipping or post-coiling to day 14 or later. Cilostazol treatment dose-dependently decreased delayed cerebral infarction and tended to improve outcomes, although cilostazol did not affect other outcome measures including angiographic vasospasm. On multivariate analyses, 300 mg/day (100 mg three times) cilostazol independently decreased delayed cerebral infarction and improved 3-month outcomes, but other regimens including 200 mg/day (100 mg twice) cilostazol were not independent prognostic factors. Propensity score-matched analyses showed that the 300 mg/day cilostazol cohort had lower plasma TNC levels and a lower incidence of delayed cerebral infarction associated with better outcomes compared with the non-cilostazol cohort. The 300 mg/day cilostazol may improve post-SAH outcomes by reducing plasma TNC levels and delayed cerebral infarction, but not vasospasm. Further studies are warranted to investigate if 300 mg/day cilostazol is more beneficial to post-SAH outcomes than a usual dose of 200 mg/day cilostazol that was demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30033486
doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0650-y
pii: 10.1007/s12975-018-0650-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
0
Cilostazol
N7Z035406B
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
381-388Références
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010 Oct 27;17(10):1009-18
pubmed: 20720374
J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):319-326
pubmed: 27494819
Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Sep;53(7):4529-38
pubmed: 26289408
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(1):89-93
pubmed: 21677432
Neural Regen Res. 2016 Feb;11(2):230-1
pubmed: 27073368
J Neurol. 2006 Sep;253(9):1170-6
pubmed: 16649098
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jul 1;83(1):137-145
pubmed: 28973675
Lancet. 2017 Feb 11;389(10069):655-666
pubmed: 27637674
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Sep;128(3):357-63
pubmed: 15354092
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Oct;23(4):310-7
pubmed: 21862932
Neural Regen Res. 2018 Jul;13(7):1175-1178
pubmed: 30028318
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61
pubmed: 20925139
Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2391-5
pubmed: 20798370
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Neurol Res. 2010 Mar;32(2):179-84
pubmed: 19589197
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2014;12(5):758-65
pubmed: 24923440
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):21-7; discussion 21-7
pubmed: 16823296
J Neurosurg. 1988 Jun;68(6):985-6
pubmed: 3131498
Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Dec;475:64-69
pubmed: 29037840
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1693-702
pubmed: 26473781
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(2):135-42
pubmed: 19506373
Neurol Res. 2010 Oct;32(8):873-8
pubmed: 20350366
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(1-2):97-105
pubmed: 27070952
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:148-159
pubmed: 28755916
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):1108-1111
pubmed: 28242775
Transl Stroke Res. 2017 Apr;8(2):165-173
pubmed: 27623837
Transl Stroke Res. 2013 Aug;4(4):432-46
pubmed: 23894255
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3333-3342
pubmed: 28004163
Transl Stroke Res. 2015 Feb;6(1):1-3
pubmed: 25502277
Circ Res. 2006 Oct 13;99(8):837-44
pubmed: 16990566
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):100-110
pubmed: 28298025
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jan;118(1):121-30
pubmed: 23039152
Neurobiol Dis. 2008 Oct;32(1):157-61
pubmed: 18675358
Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(7A):1173-85
pubmed: 4074430
Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Nov;55(11):8346-8354
pubmed: 29546590
Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Mar;55(3):1951-1958
pubmed: 28244007
Neural Regen Res. 2017 Feb;12(2):193-196
pubmed: 28400792