Low-risk prostate cancer selected for active surveillance with negative MRI at entry: can repeat biopsies at 1 year be avoided? A pilot study.
Active surveillance
MRI
PSA kinetics
Prostate cancer
Repeat biopsy
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
30
03
2018
accepted:
19
07
2018
pubmed:
25
7
2018
medline:
29
5
2019
entrez:
25
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients considered for active surveillance (AS), the use of MRI and targeted biopsies (TB) at entry challenges the approach of routine "per protocol" repeat systematic biopsies (SB) at 1 year. This pilot study aimed to assess whether an approach of performing repeat biopsies only if PSA kinetics are abnormal would be safe and sufficient to detect progression. Prospective single-centre study of 149 patients on AS with low-risk PCa, a negative MRI at entry, followed for a minimum of 12 months between 01/2007 and 12/2015. Group 1 (n = 78) patients had per-protocol 12-month repeat SB; group 2 (n = 71) patients did not. Surveillance tests for tumour progression were for both groups: for cause SB and MRI-TB biopsies if PSA velocity (PSA-V) > 0.75 ng/ml/year, or PSA doubling time (PSADT) < 3 years. The main objectives are to compare the 2-year rates of tumour progression and AS discontinuation between groups. The secondary objectives are to estimate the diagnostic power of PSA-V and PSA-DT, to predict the risk of tumour progression. Overall, 21 out of 149 patients (14.1%) showed tumour progression, 17.1% for group 1 and 12.3% for group 2, and 31 (21.2%) discontinued AS at 2 years. There was no difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.56). The area under the PSA-V and PSADT curves to predict tumour progression was 0.92 and 0.83, respectively. We did not find any significant difference for progression and AS discontinuation rate between the 2 groups. The PSA kinetic seems accurate as a marker of tumour progression. These results support the conduct of a multi-centre prospective trial to confirm these findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30039385
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2420-6
pii: 10.1007/s00345-018-2420-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
253-259Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2014-07-146
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Int J Cancer. 2007 Jan 1;120(1):170-4
pubmed: 17013897
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):833-7
pubmed: 17631355
BJU Int. 2008 Jan;101(2):165-9
pubmed: 17850361
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):1-8
pubmed: 18805628
Curr Oncol. 2010 Sep;17 Suppl 2:S11-7
pubmed: 20882126
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):396-403
pubmed: 22703025
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1732-8
pubmed: 23017866
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):597-603
pubmed: 23159452
J Urol. 2014 Mar;191(3):629-37
pubmed: 24060641
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1045-53
pubmed: 25656808
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):350-6
pubmed: 25747105
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Sep;12(9):476
pubmed: 26238030
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):11-2
pubmed: 26475660
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Mar;13(3):151-67
pubmed: 26813955
Urology. 2016 Sep;95:139-44
pubmed: 27130265
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 May;14(5):312-322
pubmed: 28290462
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):211-217
pubmed: 29433975
BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):59-65
pubmed: 29438586
Cancer. 1993 Nov 1;72(9):2638-43
pubmed: 7691393
Cancer. 1998 Jan 15;82(2):342-8
pubmed: 9445192