What can Campuses Learn From Community Sexual Assault Response Teams? Literature Review of Teams' Purpose, Activities, Membership, and Challenges.
Community Health Services
/ organization & administration
Crime Victims
Female
Gender-Based Violence
/ prevention & control
Humans
Male
Rape
/ prevention & control
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Students
/ psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Universities
/ organization & administration
campus team approaches
campuses
challenges
membership
purpose
sexual assault
sexual assault response teams
Journal
Trauma, violence & abuse
ISSN: 1552-8324
Titre abrégé: Trauma Violence Abuse
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100890578
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
27
7
2018
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
27
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sexual assault is a public health issue, with college-age students reporting high levels of victimization. Following an increase in national attention and federal initiatives, college and universities' sexual assault response efforts are being examined. The practice of community sexual assault response teams (SARTs) may provide campuses with a model strategy to coordinate campus and community service delivery and planning, still underdeveloped or missing at many institutions. This literature review summarizes in side-by-side fashion the most current empirical literature about community SARTs and campus team approaches (CTAs) in four domains: (1) defined purpose, (2) activities to achieve purpose, (3) membership, and (4) challenges to functioning. Two searches were conducted. The community SART inclusion criteria were (a) an empirical study focusing on community SARTs as the level of analysis, (b) located in the United States, (c) published between 2010 and 2017, and (d) written in English. The inclusion criteria for the CTA were (a) an empirical study on CTAs to sexual assault and/or intimate partner violence as the level of analysis and (b) written in English. Eight articles met the criteria for community SARTs, and six articles met the criteria for CTAs. Differences between community SARTs and CTAs included community SARTs shared and more discretely defined purpose and subsequent activities. Further directions offered for the conceptual and practical development of a CTA to address sexual assault include the need for clearer definition of a team's purpose leading to response-focused coordination of activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30045676
doi: 10.1177/1524838018789157
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM