Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.
Alcon LenSx
Cumulative dispersed energy
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
Ultrasound energy
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
14
01
2018
accepted:
21
07
2018
pubmed:
29
7
2018
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
29
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the amount of phacoemulsification ultrasound energy used between eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification. One eye of consecutive patients undergoing routine non-complicated phacoemulsification from January 2014 to December of 2015 was included in the analysis. FLACS was performed using the Alcon LenSx. Linear regression was used for analysis with type of surgery (FLACS versus conventional phacoemulsification) as the exposure and cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) as the outcome variable. Age, surgeon, eye side, and eye sequence (first versus second eye) were covariates. A total of 1159 surgeries met inclusion criteria. The average age of the cohort was 70.6 (SD 8.6) years, 590 cases (51%) were performed by surgeon 1, and 582 cases (50%) were right eyes. Overall, FLACS resulted in significantly lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (β = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.95). When stratified by eye side and surgeon, FLACS performed on left eyes operated on by surgeon 1 resulted in lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (β = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66, 0.87), but not for right eyes operated on by surgeon 1 (β = 0.92, 95% CI 0.79, 1.07) or for eyes operated on by surgeons 2 or 3. The use of FLACS on the Alcon LenSx platform results in a small decrease in phacoemulsification energy as compared to conventional phacoemulsification in certain cases. Further study assessing optimal laser settings and surgical technique is necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30054849
doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x
pii: 10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x
pmc: PMC6348138
mid: NIHMS1501884
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1761-1766Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K23 EY025014
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute on Aging
ID : T32 AG000262
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG000262
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Eye Institute
ID : K23 EY025014
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institutes of Health
ID : K23EY025014-01A1
Pays : United States
Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):47-52
pubmed: 25466483
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;131(11):1443-50
pubmed: 24030086
J Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;30(1):27-33
pubmed: 24864325
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 19;10:2069-2078
pubmed: 27799734
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):942-8
pubmed: 23465860
J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):717-22
pubmed: 21877677
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;28(6):387-91
pubmed: 22589291
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-21
pubmed: 28317672
J Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;30(4):222-6
pubmed: 24702572
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1307-13
pubmed: 23871112
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 25;11:1735-1739
pubmed: 29026283
J Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;28(12):879-83
pubmed: 23231739
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:401-3
pubmed: 19688027
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Jan-Feb;22(1):63-71
pubmed: 8656366
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jul;41(7):1531-3
pubmed: 26287891