Indwelling urethral versus suprapubic catheters in nursing home residents: determining the safest option for long-term use.


Journal

The Journal of hospital infection
ISSN: 1532-2939
Titre abrégé: J Hosp Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8007166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 28 06 2018
accepted: 19 07 2018
pubmed: 30 7 2018
medline: 14 8 2019
entrez: 30 7 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The incidence of infectious complications has not been previously compared for two types of common urinary catheters used in the long-term care setting: indwelling urethral catheters and suprapubic catheters. To compare catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates and multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization between nursing home residents with indwelling urethral and suprapubic catheters. Participants included 418 nursing home residents with an indwelling device enrolled in a previously published prospective targeted infection prevention study conducted between 2010 and 2013. Resident age, gender, function, comorbidities, and information on infections, antibiotic use, and recent hospitalizations were obtained at study enrolment, day 14, and every 30 days thereafter for up to one year. Microbiological samples were obtained from several anatomic sites at each visit. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for facility-level clustering and other covariates. In all, 208 study participants had an indwelling urinary catheter, contributing 21,700 device-days; 173 (83%) with a urethral catheter, 35 (17%) with a suprapubic catheter. After covariate adjustment, the suprapubic group had a lower incidence of CAUTI (6.6 vs 8.8 per 1000 device-days; P = 0.05), were half as likely to be hospitalized (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46; P < 0.01) and were 23% less likely to have had antibiotics in the past 30 days (HR = 0.77; P = 0.02). Among residents catheterized ≥90 days, the mean number of MDROs isolated in the suprapubic group was significantly higher than in the urethral group (0.57 vs 0.44; P = 0.01). Ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli were frequent in both groups. Residents with a suprapubic catheter may have fewer CAUTIs, less hospitalization and less antibiotic use, but are more likely colonized with MDROs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The incidence of infectious complications has not been previously compared for two types of common urinary catheters used in the long-term care setting: indwelling urethral catheters and suprapubic catheters.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To compare catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates and multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization between nursing home residents with indwelling urethral and suprapubic catheters.
METHODS METHODS
Participants included 418 nursing home residents with an indwelling device enrolled in a previously published prospective targeted infection prevention study conducted between 2010 and 2013. Resident age, gender, function, comorbidities, and information on infections, antibiotic use, and recent hospitalizations were obtained at study enrolment, day 14, and every 30 days thereafter for up to one year. Microbiological samples were obtained from several anatomic sites at each visit. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for facility-level clustering and other covariates.
FINDINGS RESULTS
In all, 208 study participants had an indwelling urinary catheter, contributing 21,700 device-days; 173 (83%) with a urethral catheter, 35 (17%) with a suprapubic catheter. After covariate adjustment, the suprapubic group had a lower incidence of CAUTI (6.6 vs 8.8 per 1000 device-days; P = 0.05), were half as likely to be hospitalized (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46; P < 0.01) and were 23% less likely to have had antibiotics in the past 30 days (HR = 0.77; P = 0.02). Among residents catheterized ≥90 days, the mean number of MDROs isolated in the suprapubic group was significantly higher than in the urethral group (0.57 vs 0.44; P = 0.01). Ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli were frequent in both groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Residents with a suprapubic catheter may have fewer CAUTIs, less hospitalization and less antibiotic use, but are more likely colonized with MDROs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30056015
pii: S0195-6701(18)30392-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.027
pmc: PMC6348043
mid: NIHMS1509763
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

219-225

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG050685
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG024824
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG032298
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG041780
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Références

Urol Pract. 2015 Nov;2(6):321-328
pubmed: 37559315
Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):944-51
pubmed: 23192860
Int J Urol. 2012 Jun;19(6):587-90
pubmed: 22404531
Spinal Cord. 2010 Apr;48(4):325-9
pubmed: 19823191
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):714-23
pubmed: 25775048
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jun;42(6):682-4
pubmed: 24837121
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;31(8):1797-804
pubmed: 22274858
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 May;50(5):1698-703
pubmed: 22378900
Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1038-44
pubmed: 16804872
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):854-61
pubmed: 18454750
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec;55(12):1921-6
pubmed: 18081670
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;42(2):170-5
pubmed: 25734461
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):565-71
pubmed: 22926265
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):177-80
pubmed: 21460474
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014 Jul 25;3:23
pubmed: 25075308
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):678-87
pubmed: 22914481
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 1;46(9):1368-73
pubmed: 18419438
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1;61(1):86-94
pubmed: 25814630
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Feb 1;135(3):291-301
pubmed: 1546705

Auteurs

K E Gibson (KE)

Division of Geriatric and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

S Neill (S)

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

E Tuma (E)

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

J Meddings (J)

Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

L Mody (L)

Division of Geriatric and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: lonamody@umich.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH