Physical Fitness Tests and Type 2 Diabetes Among Japanese: A Longitudinal Study From the Niigata Wellness Study.
balance
discrete-time logit model
grip strength
hyperglycemia
Journal
Journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1349-9092
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9607688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Apr 2019
05 Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
31
7
2018
medline:
17
5
2019
entrez:
31
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Simple physical fitness test can be a useful potential predictor of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We examined the association between performances on simple physical fitness tests and the incidence of T2DM. This longitudinal study was conducted in 21,802 nondiabetic Japanese (6,649 women) aged 20 to 92 years, who underwent all physical fitness tests at baseline (April 2001 to March 2002). From April 2001 to March 2008, physical fitness tests, including grip strength, vertical jump, single-leg balance with eyes closed, forward bending, whole-body reaction time, and supine legs-up, were performed every year. Participants had physical fitness tests at least two times during the period. T2DM was also annually determined based on fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and self-reported diabetes during the period. Discrete-time logit models were used to examine the influence of the serial level of each physical fitness test on the incidence of T2DM. During the entire study period, 972 participants developed diabetes. Lower relative grip strength (grip strength/body weight) and single-leg balance performance were associated with a higher incidence of T2DM. For relative grip strength, as compared with the fourth quartile group, the odds ratios for other groups ranged from 1.16 to 1.56 (P for trend < 0.001). For single-leg balance, the odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.49 (P for trend < 0.001). The performance of a simple single-leg balance test as well as that of a grip strength test were negatively associated with the risk of T2DM among Japanese.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Simple physical fitness test can be a useful potential predictor of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We examined the association between performances on simple physical fitness tests and the incidence of T2DM.
METHODS
METHODS
This longitudinal study was conducted in 21,802 nondiabetic Japanese (6,649 women) aged 20 to 92 years, who underwent all physical fitness tests at baseline (April 2001 to March 2002). From April 2001 to March 2008, physical fitness tests, including grip strength, vertical jump, single-leg balance with eyes closed, forward bending, whole-body reaction time, and supine legs-up, were performed every year. Participants had physical fitness tests at least two times during the period. T2DM was also annually determined based on fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and self-reported diabetes during the period. Discrete-time logit models were used to examine the influence of the serial level of each physical fitness test on the incidence of T2DM.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the entire study period, 972 participants developed diabetes. Lower relative grip strength (grip strength/body weight) and single-leg balance performance were associated with a higher incidence of T2DM. For relative grip strength, as compared with the fourth quartile group, the odds ratios for other groups ranged from 1.16 to 1.56 (P for trend < 0.001). For single-leg balance, the odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.49 (P for trend < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The performance of a simple single-leg balance test as well as that of a grip strength test were negatively associated with the risk of T2DM among Japanese.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30058613
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170280
pmc: PMC6414803
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
139-146Références
Diabet Med. 2009 Aug;26(8):753-9
pubmed: 19709143
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Apr;59(4):704-16
pubmed: 21438861
Diabetologia. 2007 Mar;50(3):538-44
pubmed: 17221212
Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):780-7
pubmed: 26965719
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):2557-63
pubmed: 26469674
Diabetes Care. 2004 Oct;27(10):2518-39
pubmed: 15451933
PLoS Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):e1001587
pubmed: 24453948
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):583-4
pubmed: 18071003
Diabetes Care. 1992 Nov;15(11):1701-11
pubmed: 1468304
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):577-84
pubmed: 26954518
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;30(7):529-42
pubmed: 26092138
Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):e653-e699
pubmed: 27881567
Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1671-92
pubmed: 26412212
Diabet Med. 2016 Aug;33(8):1052-9
pubmed: 26479063
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2016;38(2):245-51
pubmed: 26818203
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 May;92(2):261-4
pubmed: 21281974
Diabet Med. 2014 Nov;31(11):1363-7
pubmed: 25124930
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;89(2):97-102
pubmed: 20546959
Metabolism. 2016 Jun;65(6):883-92
pubmed: 27173467
J Diabetes Investig. 2012 Feb 20;3(1):39-40
pubmed: 24843544
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001409
pubmed: 23555200
Prev Med. 2001 Jun;32(6):465-75
pubmed: 11394950
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S81-90
pubmed: 24357215
Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Nov;45(4-5):357-69
pubmed: 26548366
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):266-73
pubmed: 25982160
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393
pubmed: 19564179
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 23;16(1):1012
pubmed: 27663845
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 1;167(3):271-9
pubmed: 18000019
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Jan;7(1):56-69
pubmed: 26816602
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;132:144-148
pubmed: 28863331
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Sep;7(5):627-32
pubmed: 20864758
Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Jul;29(7):833-41
pubmed: 15917862
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Nov;22(11):2420-5
pubmed: 25131796
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Nov;105(5):1498-503
pubmed: 18818386