Miniaturized Electromagnetic Device Abutment Improves Stability of the Dental Implants.
Adult
Aged
Bone Density
Bone Regeneration
Dental Abutments
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis Retention
Dental Restoration Failure
Electromagnetic Fields
Female
Humans
Magnetic Field Therapy
/ instrumentation
Middle Aged
Resonance Frequency Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
31
7
2018
medline:
4
9
2019
entrez:
31
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The overall success and predictability of dental implant treatment hinge on the primary stability, direct bone-to implant contact formation, and quantity and/or quality of residual bone. Pulsed electromagnetic field has been reported to increase bone regeneration in various clinical situations. Therefore, it was hypothesized that devices which could locally generate a Pulsed electromagnetic field would stimulate bone healing and increase bone density surrounding implants. To retrospectively assess the effects of the miniaturized electromagnetic device (MED) on the implants stability for the first time in human subjects, in a prospective case controlled series. Twelve consecutive patients (28 implants) were included in the study.Twelve MED healing caps and 16 regular control healing caps were inserted. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed at implant placement and abutment connection and an implant stability quotient value was given for each implant. Twenty-eight dental implants were included in the current study. Maxillary implants stability was significantly higher with MED healing cups compared with controls at 15 days postimplantation (66.2 vs 62.1, P = .0008). Resonance frequency analysis test performed at 30 days postimplantation demonstrated significantly increased stability in MED as compared with the control 73.5 ± 3.2 vs 66.7 ± 4.8 in mandibular implants and 74 ± 1.7 vs 65 ± 2.3 in maxillary implants. At the 50 days postimplantation, RFA tests revealed markedly higher stability of the maxillary implants with MED active healing caps compared with nonactive 75.4 ± 5.1 vs 68.5 ± 8.5, respectively. We conclude that MED-abutment implants demonstrated a superior stability during the early phase of healing as compared with standard implants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The overall success and predictability of dental implant treatment hinge on the primary stability, direct bone-to implant contact formation, and quantity and/or quality of residual bone. Pulsed electromagnetic field has been reported to increase bone regeneration in various clinical situations. Therefore, it was hypothesized that devices which could locally generate a Pulsed electromagnetic field would stimulate bone healing and increase bone density surrounding implants.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To retrospectively assess the effects of the miniaturized electromagnetic device (MED) on the implants stability for the first time in human subjects, in a prospective case controlled series.
METHODS
METHODS
Twelve consecutive patients (28 implants) were included in the study.Twelve MED healing caps and 16 regular control healing caps were inserted. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed at implant placement and abutment connection and an implant stability quotient value was given for each implant.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-eight dental implants were included in the current study. Maxillary implants stability was significantly higher with MED healing cups compared with controls at 15 days postimplantation (66.2 vs 62.1, P = .0008). Resonance frequency analysis test performed at 30 days postimplantation demonstrated significantly increased stability in MED as compared with the control 73.5 ± 3.2 vs 66.7 ± 4.8 in mandibular implants and 74 ± 1.7 vs 65 ± 2.3 in maxillary implants. At the 50 days postimplantation, RFA tests revealed markedly higher stability of the maxillary implants with MED active healing caps compared with nonactive 75.4 ± 5.1 vs 68.5 ± 8.5, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that MED-abutment implants demonstrated a superior stability during the early phase of healing as compared with standard implants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30059423
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004763
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng