Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis.
community nursing
community/home care
evidence-based practice
implementation
systematic review
Journal
Primary health care research & development
ISSN: 1477-1128
Titre abrégé: Prim Health Care Res Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2018
medline:
26
7
2019
entrez:
3
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
AimTo appraise and synthesize empirical literature on implementation of evidence within community nursing. To explore the use of implementation theory and identify the strategies required for, and the barriers and facilitators to, successful implementation within this context. There is an international consensus that evidence-based practice can improve outcomes for people using health and social care services. However, these practices are not always translated into care delivery. Community nursing is a relatively understudied area; little is known about how innovations in practice are implemented within this setting. Systematic mixed-studies review, synthesizing quantitative and qualitative research. The electronic databases AMED, PsycINFO, Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, ASSIA, British Nursing Index and EMBASE were used. Two grey literature databases were also searched: OpenGrey and EThOS. English language, peer-reviewed papers published between January 2010 and July 2017 were considered. Criteria included implementation of an innovation and change to practice within adult community nursing. An approach called Critical Interpretive Synthesis was used to integrate the evidence from across the studies into a comprehensible theoretical framework. In total, 22 papers were reviewed. Few studies discussed the use of theory when planning, guiding and evaluating the implementation of the innovation (n=6). A number of implementation strategies, facilitators and barriers were identified across the included studies, highlighting the interplay of both service context and individual factors in successful implementation. Implementation is an expanding area of research; yet is challenged by a lack of consistency in terminology and limited use of theory. Implementation within community nursing is a complex process, requiring both individual and organizational adoption, and managerial support. Successful adoption of evidence-based practice however, is only possible if community nurses themselves deem it useful and there is evidence that it could have a positive impact on the patient and/or their primary carer.
Sections du résumé
AimTo appraise and synthesize empirical literature on implementation of evidence within community nursing. To explore the use of implementation theory and identify the strategies required for, and the barriers and facilitators to, successful implementation within this context.
BACKGROUND
There is an international consensus that evidence-based practice can improve outcomes for people using health and social care services. However, these practices are not always translated into care delivery. Community nursing is a relatively understudied area; little is known about how innovations in practice are implemented within this setting.
METHODS
Systematic mixed-studies review, synthesizing quantitative and qualitative research. The electronic databases AMED, PsycINFO, Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, ASSIA, British Nursing Index and EMBASE were used. Two grey literature databases were also searched: OpenGrey and EThOS. English language, peer-reviewed papers published between January 2010 and July 2017 were considered. Criteria included implementation of an innovation and change to practice within adult community nursing. An approach called Critical Interpretive Synthesis was used to integrate the evidence from across the studies into a comprehensible theoretical framework.
RESULTS
In total, 22 papers were reviewed. Few studies discussed the use of theory when planning, guiding and evaluating the implementation of the innovation (n=6). A number of implementation strategies, facilitators and barriers were identified across the included studies, highlighting the interplay of both service context and individual factors in successful implementation.
CONCLUSION
Implementation is an expanding area of research; yet is challenged by a lack of consistency in terminology and limited use of theory. Implementation within community nursing is a complex process, requiring both individual and organizational adoption, and managerial support. Successful adoption of evidence-based practice however, is only possible if community nurses themselves deem it useful and there is evidence that it could have a positive impact on the patient and/or their primary carer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30068402
pii: S1463423618000488
doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000488
pmc: PMC6476399
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e6Références
Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):256-68
pubmed: 12124720
Qual Health Res. 2002 Nov;12(9):1284-99
pubmed: 12448672
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):40-6
pubmed: 12571344
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 26;6:35
pubmed: 16872487
Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 18;1:23
pubmed: 17049080
Implement Sci. 2008 Jan 07;3:1
pubmed: 18179688
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Nov;65(11):2299-310
pubmed: 19737326
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):139-54
pubmed: 19783398
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Jun;24(2):259-65
pubmed: 20030770
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jan;66(1):201-17
pubmed: 20423445
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Sep;47(9):1167-83
pubmed: 20494357
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2175-85
pubmed: 20568322
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Sep;7(5):602-12
pubmed: 20864755
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jul;19(13-14):1803-11
pubmed: 20920008
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jan;20(1-2):214-26
pubmed: 21040028
Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 22;5:91
pubmed: 21092164
Heart Lung. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6 Suppl):S34-46
pubmed: 21092830
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6
pubmed: 21244714
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):313-7
pubmed: 21844179
Can Nurse. 2012 Jan;108(1):28-32
pubmed: 22372098
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50
pubmed: 22651257
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):895-901
pubmed: 22672390
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):337-50
pubmed: 22898128
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Apr;50(4):443-4
pubmed: 23434003
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Apr;50(4):445-7
pubmed: 23485482
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Sep;21(6):867-77
pubmed: 23647739
Can J Nurs Res. 2013 Mar;45(1):54-73
pubmed: 23789527
Br J Community Nurs. 2013 Sep;18(9):452-4, 456-8
pubmed: 24005490
Br J Community Nurs. 2013 Jul;18(7):326, 328-31
pubmed: 24156194
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29-45
pubmed: 24188053
Public Health Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;31(4):317-26
pubmed: 24251677
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 02;9:2
pubmed: 24383661
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 20;15:14
pubmed: 24444024
Br J Community Nurs. 2013 Oct;18(10):505-6, 508-11
pubmed: 24471218
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Feb;71(2):326-37
pubmed: 25069605
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Jan;17(1):56-71
pubmed: 25619923
J Wound Care. 2015 Jul;24(7):312, 314-7
pubmed: 26198553
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Mar;21(3):148-54
pubmed: 26940618
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):295-300
pubmed: 27028059
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 27;16:48
pubmed: 27121500
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Apr;26(7-8):983-993
pubmed: 27192412
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Aug 2;21(8):392-8
pubmed: 27479853
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Aug;22(4):339-47
pubmed: 27562665
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 05;16:469
pubmed: 27595748
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):13
pubmed: 28178987