Reference values of left atrial size and function according to age: should we redefine the normal upper limits?
Advanced cardiac imaging
Echocardiography
Meta-analysis
Strain
Systematic review
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
17
06
2018
accepted:
26
07
2018
pubmed:
5
8
2018
medline:
15
3
2019
entrez:
5
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Different cut-offs have been proposed for left atrial (LA) size. Furthermore, conflicting results have been reported about the influence of age on LA size and data on the impact of age on LA myocardial function are scanty. The aim of this study was to derive references values for LA size and function in healthy subjects and to evaluate the impact of age. We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE database. We included only studies evaluating healthy subjects, with age ranged between 18 and 80 years. Parameters were compared among four age groups, < 30, 30-45, > 45-60, > 60 years. Three hundred twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and the final population consisted of 62,821 subjects. LA volume index (LAVi) did not differ among different age groups (p = 0.21). The normal upper limit of LAVi was 24 mL/m
Identifiants
pubmed: 30076516
doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1427-9
pii: 10.1007/s10554-018-1427-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-48Références
Heart. 2001 Mar;85(3):272-7
pubmed: 11179264
J Clin Ultrasound. 1979 Dec;7(6):439-47
pubmed: 118184
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1630-5
pubmed: 12427416
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1284-9
pubmed: 12480035
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):1036-43
pubmed: 12651054
Stat Med. 2003 Sep 15;22(17):2693-710
pubmed: 12939780
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 10;327(24):1735-9
pubmed: 1304738
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1199-205
pubmed: 14522480
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Aug;79(8):1008-14
pubmed: 15301328
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 15;96(6):832-6
pubmed: 16169372
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63
pubmed: 16376782
Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):412-8
pubmed: 16442908
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 7;47(5):1018-23
pubmed: 16516087
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 20;47(12):2357-63
pubmed: 16781359
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Feb;22(2):107-33
pubmed: 19187853
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Mar;24(3):277-313
pubmed: 21338865
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jun;24(6):680-6
pubmed: 21530166
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Nov;12(11):826-33
pubmed: 21880608
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(5):1168-74
pubmed: 2229763
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;15(3):341-8
pubmed: 24247924
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):680-90
pubmed: 24451180
Psychol Methods. 2015 Sep;20(3):360-74
pubmed: 25110905
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;8(7):753-62
pubmed: 26093921
J Intern Med. 1989 Feb;225(2):111-5
pubmed: 2921591
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Nov 15;60(14):1208-11
pubmed: 3687763
Chest. 1984 Oct;86(4):595-601
pubmed: 6236959
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1981;7(2):165-78
pubmed: 7296665
Circulation. 1995 Aug 15;92(4):835-41
pubmed: 7641364
Circulation. 1994 Feb;89(2):724-30
pubmed: 8313561
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):801-9
pubmed: 8611280