Identification of patients at risk of metastasis using a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in subpopulations of melanoma patients with favorable outcomes by standard criteria.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 18 04 2018
revised: 25 07 2018
accepted: 30 07 2018
pubmed: 7 8 2018
medline: 21 3 2019
entrez: 7 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A substantial number of patients who relapse and die from cutaneous melanoma (CM) are categorized as being at low risk by traditional staging factors. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test independently stratifies metastatic risk of patients with CM as low (Class 1, with 1A indicating lowest risk) or high (Class 2,with 2B indicating highest risk). To assess risk prediction by the 31-GEP test within 3 low-risk (according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer) populations of patients with CM: those who are sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative, those with stage I to IIA tumors, and those with thin (≤1 mm [T1]) tumors. A total of 3 previous validation studies provided a nonoverlapping cohort of 690 patients with 31-GEP results, staging information, and survival outcomes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed. The results included the identification of 70% of SLN-negative patients who experienced metastasis as Class 2, the discovery of reduced recurrence-free survival for patients with thin tumors and Class 2B biology compared with that of those with Class 1A biology (P < .0001); and determination of the 31-GEP test as an independent predictor of risk compared with traditional staging factors in patients with stage I to IIA tumors. Diagnoses spanned multiple versions of pathologic staging criteria. The 31-GEP test identifies high-risk patients who are likely to experience recurrence or die of melanoma within low-risk groups of subpopulations of patients with CM who have SLN-negative disease, stage I to IIA tumors, and thin tumors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A substantial number of patients who relapse and die from cutaneous melanoma (CM) are categorized as being at low risk by traditional staging factors. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test independently stratifies metastatic risk of patients with CM as low (Class 1, with 1A indicating lowest risk) or high (Class 2,with 2B indicating highest risk).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess risk prediction by the 31-GEP test within 3 low-risk (according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer) populations of patients with CM: those who are sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative, those with stage I to IIA tumors, and those with thin (≤1 mm [T1]) tumors.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 3 previous validation studies provided a nonoverlapping cohort of 690 patients with 31-GEP results, staging information, and survival outcomes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results included the identification of 70% of SLN-negative patients who experienced metastasis as Class 2, the discovery of reduced recurrence-free survival for patients with thin tumors and Class 2B biology compared with that of those with Class 1A biology (P < .0001); and determination of the 31-GEP test as an independent predictor of risk compared with traditional staging factors in patients with stage I to IIA tumors.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Diagnoses spanned multiple versions of pathologic staging criteria.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The 31-GEP test identifies high-risk patients who are likely to experience recurrence or die of melanoma within low-risk groups of subpopulations of patients with CM who have SLN-negative disease, stage I to IIA tumors, and thin tumors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30081113
pii: S0190-9622(18)32328-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.028
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

149-157.e4

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Brian R Gastman (BR)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.

Pedram Gerami (P)

Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Skin Cancer Institute, Northwestern University Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Sarah J Kurley (SJ)

Castle Biosciences, Inc, Friendswood, Texas.

Robert W Cook (RW)

Castle Biosciences, Inc, Friendswood, Texas. Electronic address: rcook@castlebiosciences.com.

Sancy Leachman (S)

Department of Dermatology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

John T Vetto (JT)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH