Outcome of patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma staged with
FDG
Positron emission tomography
Prognosis
Radiotherapy
lymphoma
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
07
02
2018
accepted:
26
07
2018
pubmed:
8
8
2018
medline:
21
5
2019
entrez:
8
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) staging on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with early-stage (stages I and II) follicular lymphoma (ESFL) treated with radiation therapy alone. Eighty-five patients with ESFL treated with curative-intent radiation therapy (RT) between December 2000 and May 2011 were identified. Of those, 13 who had no PET staging and 25 who received additional systemic therapy were excluded from the analysis. Thus, we analyzed 47 patients with PET-staged ESFL treated with definitive radiation therapy alone (dose > 23Gy). Tumour features, pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) and PET stage, dose fractionation, and radiation therapy field extent were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the OS and PFS. Patterns of failure were assessed as cumulative incidences assuming competing risks. Median age was 57 years (range 24-83); 43% were females. Most were PET stage 1 (76.6%). Median maximum nodal diameter was 3 cm. Median pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 327.5 (range 123-607, upper normal limit = 220). Twenty-six patients (55.3%) had infra-diaphragmatic disease. All received 30-36Gy in 15-24 fractions, with 59.6% treated with involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) techniques. There was no significant difference in PFS between CT stage I and stage II (HR 1.30 95% CI [0.25-6.72], p = 0.75) with a 5-year PFS of 77% and 78% respectively. However, stage I on PET staging had a significantly better PFS than stage II (HR 4.66 95% CI [1.15-18.8], p = 0.038), with 5-year PFS of 84% and 60% respectively. Ten patients had recurrent disease, with distant disease being the first site of failure in seven patients. Seven-year OS was 91% (95% CI 79-100) for the whole cohort. FDG-PET should be considered an essential element in the evaluation of patients with ESFL being considered for RT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30083824
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4112-2
pii: 10.1007/s00259-018-4112-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Radiopharmaceuticals
0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80-86Références
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 20;30(27):3368-75
pubmed: 22915662
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007 Jul;17(3):190-7
pubmed: 17591566
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 1;71(1):213-9
pubmed: 18295982
Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 May;59(5):1163-1171
pubmed: 28901817
Blood. 2005 Feb 15;105(4):1417-23
pubmed: 15494430
J Nucl Med. 2001 Aug;42(8):1139-43
pubmed: 11483671
Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3843-51
pubmed: 20564102
Hematol Oncol. 2005 Mar;23(1):10-7
pubmed: 16158458
Ann Oncol. 2003 Feb;14(2):273-6
pubmed: 12562655
Ann Oncol. 2001 Jun;12(6):825-30
pubmed: 11484959
Ann Oncol. 2006 May;17(5):780-4
pubmed: 16497824
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8447-52
pubmed: 16230674
Radiother Oncol. 1995 Sep;36(3):167-71
pubmed: 8532901
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 06;8(6):e65156
pubmed: 23762303
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Dec 1;51(5):1219-27
pubmed: 11728680
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 1;64(3):928-34
pubmed: 16243446
Ann Hematol. 2005 Jan;84(1):1-12
pubmed: 15480663
Ann Nucl Med. 2002 Jul;16(5):337-45
pubmed: 12230093
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984 Apr;10(4):489-97
pubmed: 6725039
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1282-90
pubmed: 8648385
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2860-2866
pubmed: 28295218
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(8):2350-6
pubmed: 25426666
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Mar;32A(3):470-9
pubmed: 8814695
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3048-58
pubmed: 25113771
Nuklearmedizin. 2006;45(3):126-33
pubmed: 16710509
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Mar;32A(3):480-90
pubmed: 8814696
Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):575-81
pubmed: 12409597
Eur J Nucl Med. 1998 Jul;25(7):721-8
pubmed: 9662594
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Sep 1;42(2):365-71
pubmed: 9788417