Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.


Journal

Psychological research
ISSN: 1430-2772
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0435062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 11 12 2017
accepted: 17 07 2018
pubmed: 8 8 2018
medline: 1 9 2020
entrez: 8 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Congruency Sequence Effect (CSE) denotes the common finding that distractor-target Congruency Effects are reduced after incongruent compared to after congruent trials. Although the CSE is widely attributed to attentional adjustment (i.e., increasing or decreasing the bias in attentional weights regarding processing the target or distractor), unequivocal evidence for this assumption is missing. To investigate the CSE and attentional adjustment we used a temporal flanker task and intermixed a "temporal search task", in which a target stimulus occurred randomly at one of two temporal positions, corresponding to the temporal positions of the target and the distractor occurrence in the temporal flanker task. We observed a CSE that could not be explained in terms of feature sequences, distractor-related contingencies, or a strategy of reversed distractor-response priming after incongruent trials. Furthermore, following a temporal search task trial, the Congruency Effect was larger when the search target occurred on the first than on the second temporal position, demonstrating that a reduced attentional bias towards the second temporal position increased interference from a distractor presented on the first temporal position. This supports a crucial assumption of the attentional adjustment account of the CSE. Performance in the temporal search task, however, provided no evidence for attentional adjustment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30083838
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1061-0
pii: 10.1007/s00426-018-1061-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

292-301

Subventions

Organisme : DFG
ID : WE 4105/1-2

Références

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Feb;43(2):326-333
pubmed: 27732019
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2022-2037
pubmed: 25089574
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):356-67
pubmed: 16752599
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1217-27
pubmed: 18927038
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):176-86
pubmed: 21745649
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):750-7
pubmed: 22549895
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1260-72
pubmed: 17225507
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):615-30
pubmed: 23325703
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:60-8
pubmed: 24704781
Psychol Res. 2004 Feb;68(1):1-17
pubmed: 14752663
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):742-8
pubmed: 17972743
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102337
pubmed: 25019526
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):76-82
pubmed: 21327366
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):312-23
pubmed: 12466928
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):675-86
pubmed: 22004199
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1898-914
pubmed: 21767054
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Aug;34(4):872-83
pubmed: 18665732
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1104-12
pubmed: 17583987
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):529-53
pubmed: 2932529
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(2):142-8
pubmed: 20178944
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Jun;16(2):421-35
pubmed: 16899377
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):1076-86
pubmed: 17907873
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):328-33
pubmed: 16893003
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):505-11
pubmed: 21404129
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:8-21
pubmed: 25616120
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Dec;5(4):467-72
pubmed: 16541815
J Neurosci. 2014 Dec 10;34(50):16720-5
pubmed: 25505324
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):480-506
pubmed: 1431740
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):350-5
pubmed: 19293106
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):518-25
pubmed: 18426302
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):133-9
pubmed: 22964053
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
pubmed: 11488380
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):644-67
pubmed: 16822130

Auteurs

Miriam Tomat (M)

Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany. tomatm@hsu-hh.de.

Mike Wendt (M)

Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez (A)

Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.

Michael Sprengel (M)

Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.

Thomas Jacobsen (T)

Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH