Muscle mass estimation on breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients: comparison between psoas muscle area on computer tomography and pectoralis muscle area on MRI.
Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
/ complications
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Pectoralis Muscles
/ diagnostic imaging
Psoas Muscles
/ diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sarcopenia
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Breast cancer
Magnetic resonance imaging
Muscle mass
Pectoralis muscle
Psoas muscle
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
03
04
2018
accepted:
13
07
2018
revised:
02
07
2018
pubmed:
9
8
2018
medline:
26
2
2019
entrez:
9
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the correlation between psoas muscle area (TPA) on CT images and pectoralis muscle area (PMA) on MRI in breast cancer patients. This retrospective study was institutional review board approved and women involved gave written informed consent. Twenty six patients with both body CT and breast MRI available were evaluated. Two radiologists calculated TPA on 1.25-mm and 5-mm body CT images. Two radiologists measured PMA on axial T1-weighted images. Statistical analysis included inter- and intra-reader agreement and correlation between TPA on CT and PMA on MRI. The Pearson r correlation coefficient was 0.70 (95% CI 0.41-0.81) and the coefficient of determination was 0.49. The inter-reader agreement was k = 0.85 and k = 0.79 for axial 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. The intra-reader agreement of reader 1 was k = 0.98 and k = 0.94 for 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. The intra-reader agreement of reader 2 was k = 0.95 and k = 0.94 for 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. On axial T1-weighted images, the inter-reader agreement for radiologists evaluating the PMA was k = 0.61. Intra-observer agreement of reader 1 and reader 2 for PMA estimation was good (0.62 and 0.64), respectively. The correlation between TPA on CT images and PMA on MRI was very good. Pectoralis muscle area on breast MRI could be useful to estimate muscle mass in women with breast cancer. • Pectoralis muscle area can be estimated on breast MRI • Total psoas area on CT and pectoralis muscle area on MRI are strongly correlated • Pectoralis muscle area on breast MRI could estimate the skeletal muscle mass.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30088069
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5663-0
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5663-0
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
494-500Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93
pubmed: 12858311
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Dec;97(6):2333-8
pubmed: 15310748
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89
pubmed: 17392385
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):671-9
pubmed: 18458280
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;15(8):2920-6
pubmed: 19351764
Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;29(2):154-9
pubmed: 20060626
Invest Radiol. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-105
pubmed: 21139507
Oncologist. 2012;17(10):1240-5
pubmed: 22903527
J Cancer Surviv. 2012 Dec;6(4):398-406
pubmed: 23054848
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):O20-6
pubmed: 25328119
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3669-78
pubmed: 26002130
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30
pubmed: 26314782
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jan 07;108(3):null
pubmed: 26744477
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):38-43
pubmed: 27197281
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):1046-1054
pubmed: 27556335
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:9-15
pubmed: 27810702
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Apr;8(2):305-316
pubmed: 27896952
Acad Radiol. 2017 Apr;24(4):411-417
pubmed: 27986508
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3167-3173
pubmed: 28050694
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):47007-47019
pubmed: 28388585
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Mar;26(3):861-868
pubmed: 28948392
Clin Radiol. 2018 Apr;73(4):327-333
pubmed: 29273223
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
BMJ. 1996 Jul 13;313(7049):106
pubmed: 8688716
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):744
pubmed: 8819450
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 15;147(8):755-63
pubmed: 9554417