Assessment of the safety climate in outpatient diagnostic services: Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire.
Organisational culture
Outpatient service
Psychometrics
Safety
Surveys and questionnaires
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
11
05
2018
accepted:
03
07
2018
revised:
25
06
2018
pubmed:
9
8
2018
medline:
26
3
2019
entrez:
9
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Safe practice and safety culture are important issues in outpatient diagnostic imaging services. As questionnaires assessing safety culture through the measurement of safety climate in this setting are not yet available, the present study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument. After adaptation of an existing questionnaire and qualitative pretesting, the instrument was tested by collaborators from three outpatient imaging services in Switzerland. Results were first assessed using descriptive statistics. Scores of individual services were compared using a Wilcoxon test assessing differences between rank distributions. The final instrument was tested for validity using inter-rater agreement measures, such as reliability within groups (r Safety climate scores vary significantly between services. Inter-rater agreement measures show that item aggregation is justified and that the instrument distinguishes various patterns of safety climate. The final instrument proves to be valid, consistent and reliable. The final instrument presents a valid, consistent and reliable option to measure safety climate in outpatient diagnostic imaging services. Results can be used as a basis for quality improvement. • An adapted questionnaire that assesses safety climate in outpatient diagnostic imaging services was developed and tested in Switzerland. • Psychometric evaluation showed the questionnaire to be a valid, consistent and reliable instrument. • Results are of interest for imaging services as well as for stakeholders interested more globally in monitoring and quality improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30088070
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5646-1
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5646-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1538-1545Références
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Mar;30(3):125-32
pubmed: 15032069
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6
pubmed: 16195571
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 03;6:44
pubmed: 16584553
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):1-5
pubmed: 17351834
Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5):1312-7
pubmed: 17414090
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1388-94
pubmed: 17449787
Health Care Manag Sci. 2007 Jun;10(2):139-49
pubmed: 17608055
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(8):521-9
pubmed: 19998780
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):578-84
pubmed: 20406910
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 08;10:199
pubmed: 20615247
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep 01;18(9):e323-37
pubmed: 23009331
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):369-74
pubmed: 23460092
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347
pubmed: 24016183
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):239-61
pubmed: 24099346
J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):135-42
pubmed: 24583952
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):332-8
pubmed: 25656302
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):680-7
pubmed: 26453636
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;114:58-71
pubmed: 27566270
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181410
pubmed: 28753633
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):685-692
pubmed: 28992144