Development of the Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures: a short and complete clavicle score with patient-reported and objective measures.
Clavicle
Functional outcome
Patient-reported
Questionnaire
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
ISSN: 1863-9941
Titre abrégé: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101313350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2017
accepted:
10
07
2018
pubmed:
11
8
2018
medline:
21
5
2020
entrez:
11
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to develop a clavicle-specific questionnaire with patient-reported and objective measures. The present study used data of DASH and Constant scores from a previously performed randomized-controlled trial comparing plate and intramedullary pin fixation of clavicle fractures. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the most relevant items and the underlying structure of the questionnaires. To optimize the applicability to patients with a clavicle fracture, the selected items were reformulated. If relevant themes were underexposed, an additional question was added. Based on the scree plot of eigenvalues and the parallel analysis, a seven-factor model with good factorability was constructed. Using exploratory factor analysis, 13 patient-reported and 2 objective measurements were identified. The internal consistency of the selected questions was excellent. An additional question was added to cover complaints relating to direct pressure on the clavicle and implants. The Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures is a compact yet complete tool that was developed to assess functional outcome specifically in patients with a clavicle fracture, consisting of patient-reported and objective measures. After external validation, the USC can be used for research purposes or clinical follow-up during rehabilitation in patients with a clavicle fracture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30094611
doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0979-7
pii: 10.1007/s00068-018-0979-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1045-1052Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 06;(6):CD009363
pubmed: 23740670
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct;19(7):1013-7
pubmed: 20637655
Phys Ther. 2000 Aug;80(8):759-68
pubmed: 10911414
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8
pubmed: 8773720
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133
pubmed: 18277234
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94
pubmed: 12469084
J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Mar;25(2):330-40
pubmed: 10722826
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-33
pubmed: 15789004
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 May-Jun;14(3):273-8
pubmed: 15889026
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):882-90
pubmed: 8666606
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3351-5
pubmed: 21590485
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Aug;24(2):57-65
pubmed: 8832468
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4
pubmed: 3791738
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Jun;26(5):452-7
pubmed: 21316822
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):MR000008
pubmed: 19588449
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52
pubmed: 22958838
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):613-9
pubmed: 25878304
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120
pubmed: 20037639
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9
pubmed: 11188601
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):138-51
pubmed: 16596890