The Processing of Grammatical Gender Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP Evidence in Favor of a Single Route.
Brazilian Portuguese
Event-related potentials
Gender agreement
Regular and irregular forms
Journal
Journal of psycholinguistic research
ISSN: 1573-6555
Titre abrégé: J Psycholinguist Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0333506
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
18
8
2018
medline:
31
5
2019
entrez:
18
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study used event-related potentials to investigate whether the processing of grammatical gender agreement involving gender regular and irregular forms recruit the same or distinct neurocognitive mechanisms and whether different grammatical gender agreement conditions elicit the same or diverse ERP signals. Native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese read sentences containing congruent and incongruent grammatical gender agreement between a determiner and a regular or an irregular form (condition 1) and between a regular or an irregular form and an adjective (condition 2). However, in condition 2, trials with incongruent regular forms elicited more positive ongoing waveforms than trial with incongruent irregular forms. We found a biphasic LAN/P600 effect for gender agreement violation involving regular and irregular forms in both conditions. Our findings suggest that gender agreement between determiner and nouns recruits the same neurocognitive mechanisms regardless of the nouns' form and that, depending on the grammatical class of the words involved in gender agreement, differences in ERP signals can emerge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30116977
doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z
pii: 10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-198Subventions
Organisme : Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ID : Projeto CAPES-NUFFIC 051/13 [23038.007129/2013-40
Organisme : Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ID : Bolsa de Doutorado Sanduíche [11598/13-1]
Références
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jul;12(4):556-68
pubmed: 10936910
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):47-58
pubmed: 11240111
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):37-69
pubmed: 11291183
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75
pubmed: 11301520
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Nov;30(6):627-51
pubmed: 11913850
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Jan;31(1):45-63
pubmed: 11924839
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):98-110
pubmed: 12590846
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S18-29
pubmed: 14597293
Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):231-70
pubmed: 15037131
Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):863-6
pubmed: 15073532
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):137-53
pubmed: 15701245
Brain Res Bull. 2005 Apr 30;65(4):301-8
pubmed: 15811595
Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):107-42
pubmed: 1582154
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):435-45
pubmed: 17070703
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Mar;96(3):229-46
pubmed: 17324673
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):963-74
pubmed: 17445790
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):912-23
pubmed: 17490895
J Child Lang. 1991 Oct;18(3):571-90
pubmed: 1761614
Science. 1991 Aug 2;253(5019):530-5
pubmed: 1857983
Cortex. 2011 Sep;47(8):908-30
pubmed: 21458791
Brain Res. 2012 May 25;1456:49-63
pubmed: 22520436
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Feb;43(1):13-25
pubmed: 23377903
Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):1019-30
pubmed: 25817315
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):847-62
pubmed: 7651809
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):992-1004
pubmed: 8920836
Neuroreport. 1997 Mar 3;8(4):957-62
pubmed: 9141072
J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 Jan;27(1):23-45
pubmed: 9476356