Accuracy and Acceptability of Commercial-Grade Physical Activity Monitors in Older Adults.
accuracy
gait speed
pedometer
step count
walking
Journal
Journal of aging and physical activity
ISSN: 1543-267X
Titre abrégé: J Aging Phys Act
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2019
01 04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
18
8
2018
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
18
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of seven commercial activity monitors in measuring steps in older adults with varying walking abilities and to assess monitor acceptability and usability. Forty-three participants (age = 87 ± 5.7 years) completed a gait speed assessment, two walking trials while wearing the activity monitors, and questionnaires about usability features and activity monitor preferences. The Accusplit AX2710 Accelerometer Pedometer had the highest accuracy (93.68% ± 13.95%), whereas the Fitbit Charge had the lowest (39.12% ± 40.3%). Device accuracy varied based on assistive device use, and none of the monitors were accurate at gait speeds <0.08 m/s. Barriers to monitor usability included inability to apply monitor and access the step display. Monitor accuracy was rated as the most important feature, and ability to interface with a smart device was the least important feature. This study identified the limitations of the current commercial activity monitors in both step counting accuracy and usability features for older adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30117355
doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0036
pmc: PMC7023914
mid: NIHMS1068335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
222-229Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K07 AG052668
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG057728
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG024827
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R21 AG034263
Pays : United States
Références
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Jun;16(4):420-8
pubmed: 12061477
J Aging Phys Act. 2014 Jul;22(3):334-41
pubmed: 23921227
J Aging Phys Act. 2013 Apr;21(2):167-85
pubmed: 22898451
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(15):1317-22
pubmed: 22200080
Gait Posture. 2018 Jan;59:177-181
pubmed: 29049964
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct;53(10):1675-80
pubmed: 16181165
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015 Jul 8;1(1):e000013
pubmed: 27900119
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):59-64
pubmed: 18091020
J Aging Phys Act. 2008 Apr;16(2):201-14
pubmed: 18483442
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jan;55(1):120-4
pubmed: 17233695
Int J Ther Rehabil. 2012 Jul 3;19(7):387-393
pubmed: 24795762
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):39-46
pubmed: 22923430
Phys Ther. 2017 May 1;97(5):581-588
pubmed: 28339904
Disabil Health J. 2016 Apr;9(2):320-3
pubmed: 26905972
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Oct;56 Spec No 2:13-22
pubmed: 11730234
J Aging Res. 2012;2012:271589
pubmed: 22675631
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Mar;51(3):387-92
pubmed: 12588583
Prev Med. 2004 Aug;39(2):361-8
pubmed: 15226047
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Jun;25(5):444-9
pubmed: 20347194
J Aging Phys Act. 2012 Jul;20(3):379-94
pubmed: 22186798
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:199-203
pubmed: 28666177
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Dec;78(5):401-6
pubmed: 18274211