Distinguishing Characteristics of Robotic Writing.
autopen
forensic science
handwriting analysis
natural handwriting
questioned documents
robotic writing
variation
Journal
Journal of forensic sciences
ISSN: 1556-4029
Titre abrégé: J Forensic Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375370
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
25
05
2018
revised:
02
07
2018
accepted:
14
07
2018
pubmed:
18
8
2018
medline:
18
8
2018
entrez:
18
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advances in robotic handwriting technology create new challenges for forensic document examiners. In the past, devices such as the autopen were used to replicate signatures of government officials and corporate companies. In today's technology, companies such as Bond utilize robots to create written documents, which mimic natural patterns of handwriting. They generate customizable written samples by simulating pen movements and letter formations. Four forensic document examiners were given various reproduced questioned documents and utilized a modified ACE-V (analysis, comparison, evaluation, verification) methodology to determine their genuineness. Examiners were able to make a distinction between the human writing samples and the skilled robotic equivalents. Several distinct features that are not seen in natural handwriting, such as even pen pressure and the superimposition of letterforms were observed in the robotic samples. Careful examination of identifying features of the Bond produced documents resulted in an opinion of nongenuineness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30118539
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13886
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
468-474Informations de copyright
© 2018 New York City Police Department. Journal of Forensic Sciences.