Clinical and radiological analysis of a personalized total knee arthroplasty system design.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ instrumentation
Female
Femur
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Knee Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee
/ diagnostic imaging
Patella
/ diagnostic imaging
Pilot Projects
Precision Medicine
Prosthesis Design
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Tibia
/ diagnostic imaging
New design
Radiological assessment
Total knee arthroplasty
Journal
International orthopaedics
ISSN: 1432-5195
Titre abrégé: Int Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7705431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
24
08
2017
accepted:
06
08
2018
pubmed:
22
8
2018
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
22
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objectives of this study were to determine the radiological outcome of a new personalized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design and also to analyze the radiological reproducibility of the surgical technique. A total of 100 consecutive TKAs performed in 99 patients using Persona knee system were recruited. Weight-bearing standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were done in all the patients, both pre-operatively as well as post-operatively, and various radiological parameters were analyzed and compared. The full correction of the limb mechanical axis was achieved in 97% of patients, and the radiological parameters of coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral and tibial components showed good results. There were no substantial differences between the mean pre-operative and post-operative patellar height indices, and data were in the normal range. Posterior condylar offset (PCO) and posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) had increased as expected after TKA. The coverage of tibia was optimal with data in the normal range. Radiological assessment of the new personalized knee system design showed excellent results with various parameters restored to the normal values. Therefore, the prosthesis can be considered anatomic, and the surgical technique is reproducible allowing the prosthesis to be implanted easily and with high precision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30128671
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4095-4
pii: 10.1007/s00264-018-4095-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1113-1121Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):126-134
pubmed: 29529627
Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2519-2526
pubmed: 27447464
J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Sep;13(3):159-62
pubmed: 22527151
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1855-60
pubmed: 26803321
J Knee Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):943-950
pubmed: 28282674
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005 Dec;13(3):280-4
pubmed: 16365492
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1411-7
pubmed: 21598009
Int Orthop. 2016 Apr;40(4):709-14
pubmed: 26206260
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Nov;193(5):1361-6
pubmed: 19843754
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Oct;25(7):1131-6
pubmed: 20022455
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Dec;22(12):2911-23
pubmed: 25217314
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2641-5
pubmed: 26037546
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(6):728-33
pubmed: 26058850
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):700-703
pubmed: 29108793
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Oct;94(10):1321-9
pubmed: 23015555
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25(5):895-903
pubmed: 26026693
Knee. 2012 Dec;19(6):843-5
pubmed: 22682692
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):9-12
pubmed: 2805502
J Orthop Res. 2013 Oct;31(10):1643-52
pubmed: 23801307
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):50-3
pubmed: 11837832