Treatment Decisions for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patient and Physician Perspectives on Maintenance Therapy.


Journal

The patient
ISSN: 1178-1661
Titre abrégé: Patient
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101309314

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 22 8 2018
medline: 13 7 2019
entrez: 22 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a severe disease with burdensome symptoms and traditionally poor outcomes. The treatment of advance disease is based on chemotherapy, with the recent addition of immunotherapy. Patients who respond to initial treatment can opt to receive maintenance therapy (MT). It is important to understand why patients with advanced NSCLC choose to accept or refuse therapy, and how physician recommendations play into this decision-making process. This study characterized patient and physician decision-making regarding treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC in the USA using the example of MT. This study employed multiple approaches: patient interviews, a patient survey, and a physician survey. Qualitative interviews were conducted among patients who had been offered MT to identify factors influencing treatment decision-making. The patient survey explored the decision-making process and quantified challenges and motivators for receiving MT. The physician survey included a discrete choice experiment to understand the relationship between physician treatment recommendations and patient characteristics. Interviewed patients (n = 10) were motivated to receive MT in the hope of extending their lives and being proactive against their cancer, and they anticipated reduced adverse effects compared with first-line therapy. Surveyed patients (n = 77) described several deterrents to receiving therapy; the most prominent was severity of adverse effects, which was an influencing factor for 34% of patients. The major motivator for receiving therapy was the potential to extend life, which influenced 97% of patients. A total of 100 oncologists participated in the physician survey. Patients' lack of treatment motivation/inconvenience, disease progression, presence of severe renal co-morbidities, and older age decreased the likelihood of physicians recommending the use of MT. This study identified challenges and motivators influencing advanced NSCLC patients' decisions to accept or refuse therapy, as well as patient and disease characteristics associated with physician's treatment recommendations for MT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30128728
doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0327-3
pii: 10.1007/s40271-018-0327-3
pmc: PMC6397138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

223-233

Références

Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Nov;45(2):149-57
pubmed: 11687329
Oncologist. 2008;13 Suppl 1:28-36
pubmed: 18263772
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 May;83(5):584-94
pubmed: 18452692
Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):715-8
pubmed: 19004964
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Feb;6(2):365-71
pubmed: 21173713
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):292-9
pubmed: 22336221
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Sep;21(5):642-9
pubmed: 22519874
Curr Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(Suppl 1):S52-8
pubmed: 22787411
Curr Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(Suppl 1):S64-72
pubmed: 22787413
Lung Cancer. 2013 Aug;81(2):288-93
pubmed: 23561304
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2895-902
pubmed: 23835707
Semin Oncol. 2014 Feb;41(1):69-92
pubmed: 24565582
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jul;9(7):991-7
pubmed: 24926544
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 26;11:1647-1656
pubmed: 29033552
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;18(1):79
pubmed: 29334910

Auteurs

Suzanne McMullen (S)

ICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Lisa M Hess (LM)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Edward S Kim (ES)

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Benjamin Levy (B)

Mount Sinai Health Systems, New York, NY, USA.

Mohamed Mohamed (M)

Cone Health, Greensboro, NC, USA.

David Waterhouse (D)

Oncology Hematology Care (OHC), Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Antoinette Wozniak (A)

Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.

Sarah Goring (S)

ICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Kerstin Müller (K)

ICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Kerstin.Mueller@iconplc.com.

Catherine Muehlenbein (C)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Himani Aggarwal (H)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Yajun Zhu (Y)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Ana B Oton (AB)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Jennifer L Ersek (JL)

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Katherine B Winfree (KB)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH