Political legitimacy and research ethics.
CIOMS
Declaration of Helsinki
guidelines
political legitimacy
research ethics
Journal
Bioethics
ISSN: 1467-8519
Titre abrégé: Bioethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
10
12
2017
revised:
23
04
2018
accepted:
21
05
2018
pubmed:
24
8
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
24
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In democratic theory, "legitimacy" refers to the set of conditions that must be in place in order for the claims to authority of somebody to be deemed appropriate, and for their claims to compliance to be warranted. Though criteria of legitimacy have been elaborated in the context of democratic states, there is no reason for them not to be drawn up, with appropriate amendments, for other kinds of authority structures. This paper examines the claims to authority made over researchers by international bodies governing research ethics, who exercise their authority by the research ethics guidelines they produce (including recent revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki and CIOMS Guidelines). We argue that discussions of such bodies and sets of guidelines often elide questions of justification and questions of legitimacy, and that the grounds that might allow us to mount a strong case for the latter are at present sorely underdeveloped.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
312-318Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 144487
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.