The presence of patellar tendinopathy in the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft may increase the risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Autografts
Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting
/ adverse effects
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Patellar Ligament
/ physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Tendinopathy
/ physiopathology
Treatment Failure
Young Adult
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft
Graft failure
Patellar tendinopathy
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
06
05
2018
accepted:
12
07
2018
pubmed:
25
8
2018
medline:
6
5
2019
entrez:
25
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of patellar tendinopathy on primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction graft failure when using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. All patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral BPTB with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) available for review were approached for eligibility. The medical charts of included patients were reviewed to obtain demographic information, anatomical characteristics, injury characteristics, treatment characteristics, length of follow-up, and presence of graft failure. A single, fellowship-trained, knee-specialist and blinded researcher performed preoperative MRI interpretation of patellar tendinopathy. The presence/absence of patellar tendinopathy (none, mild, moderate, or severe changes) was compared between patients with (cases) and without (controls) failure of ACL reconstruction. There were 559 cases with a median (range) clinical follow-up was 8 (4-30) months and an average age of 21.5 years (82% males). Of the 559 cases, there were 182 (32.6%) with and 377 (67.4%) without patellar tendinopathy. A total of 32 (5.7%) graft failures occurred. There were a significantly higher failure rate in patients with compared to without patellar tendinopathy (p < 0.001), and in patients with compared to without partial tendon tear (p < 0.001). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for graft failure was 5.9 (2.7-13.1), 20.8 (6.8-63.9) and 54.4 (5.5-539.4) in patients with patellar tendinopathy (compared to absence of patellar tendinopathy), moderate or severe patellar tendinopathy (compared to none or mild patellar tendinopathy), or partial tendon tear (compared to absence of tendon tear), respectively. The presence of patellar tendinopathy increases the risk of BPTB graft failure when used for ACL reconstruction. The use of BPTB autograft is not recommended if patellar tendinopathy is obvious or there are suspicious of partial tendon tear on MRI. In such cases, the surgeon should consider using a different graft. Retrospective cohort analysis, Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30141146
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5066-4
pii: 10.1007/s00167-018-5066-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
766-772Références
Am J Sports Med. 1999 May-Jun;27(3):345-9
pubmed: 10352771
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul;175(1):251-60
pubmed: 10882283
J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Jul;19(7):473-9
pubmed: 10898301
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001 Dec;11(6):321-7
pubmed: 11782263
Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;34(1):79-98
pubmed: 12735203
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1986-95
pubmed: 15572332
Sports Med. 2005;35(1):71-87
pubmed: 15651914
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):561-7
pubmed: 15722279
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):524-30
pubmed: 15722283
Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jul;11(3):533-78
pubmed: 1638640
Arthroscopy. 2008 Mar;24(3):292-8
pubmed: 18308180
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):1889-95
pubmed: 18490470
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):242-6
pubmed: 19910782
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):1906-11
pubmed: 21642599
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):1984-8
pubmed: 21737835
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):607-13
pubmed: 22260424
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):531-6
pubmed: 22438002
Sports Health. 2011 Jan;3(1):73-81
pubmed: 23015994
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2439-48
pubmed: 23585484
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1571-8
pubmed: 23698386
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):285-91
pubmed: 24322979
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1574-82
pubmed: 24778266
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2319-28
pubmed: 25201444
J Knee Surg. 2016 May;29(4):329-36
pubmed: 26238768
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2501-9
pubmed: 26311445
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Oct;3(4):220-40
pubmed: 26550585
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Sep 27;4(9):2325967116666039
pubmed: 27734019
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):128-138
pubmed: 28223305
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1529-1536
pubmed: 28296429
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1567-1573
pubmed: 28298067
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jun 14;5(6):2325967117709735
pubmed: 28660230
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov 19;6(11):2325967118807710
pubmed: 30480020
Sports Med. 1995 Aug;20(2):77-89
pubmed: 7481284
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jul;165(1):115-8
pubmed: 7785569
Am J Sports Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):694-701
pubmed: 8600737
Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):821-7
pubmed: 8756939
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997 Apr;7(2):78-85
pubmed: 9211608