Use of laparoscopic colectomy increasing in trauma: comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy.
Colon injury
Colorectal
Laparoscopic colectomy
Open colectomy
Trauma
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
accepted:
21
08
2018
pubmed:
26
8
2018
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
26
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laparoscopy accounts for > 70% of general surgical cases. Given the increased use of laparoscopy in emergent colorectal disease, we hypothesized that there would be an increased use of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in trauma patients. In addition, we hypothesized increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality in trauma patients undergoing open colectomy (OC) vs. LC. This was a retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank (2008-2015). We included adult patients undergoing LC or OC. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for determining risk of LOS and mortality. We identified 19,788 (96.8%) patients undergoing OC and 644 (3.2%) who underwent LC. There was a 21-fold increased number of patients that underwent LC over the study period (p < 0.05), with approximately 119 per 10,000 trauma patients undergoing LC. The most common operation was a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (27.5%). LC patients had a lower median injury severity score (ISS) (16 vs. 17, p < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS (p = 0.14) or mortality (p = 0.44) between the two groups. This remained true in patients with isolated colorectal injury. The use of LC has increased 21-fold from 2008 to 2015, with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy being the most common procedure performed. There was no difference in LOS, in-hospital complications, or mortality between the two groups. We suggest that LC should be considered in stable adult trauma patients undergoing colectomy. However, future prospective research is needed to help determine which trauma patients may benefit from LC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30143986
doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0588-3
pii: 10.1007/s13304-018-0588-3
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105-111Références
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):418-23
pubmed: 24458047
JSLS. 2001 Jan-Mar;5(1):89-94
pubmed: 11304004
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1459-63; discussion 1463-5
pubmed: 18545109
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9
pubmed: 15141043
Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):1052-61
pubmed: 24781574
JSLS. 2008 Jan-Mar;12(1):109-11
pubmed: 18402752
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):11-20
pubmed: 10401735
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):115-20
pubmed: 20103076
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):955-65; discussion 965-8
pubmed: 18404062
Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):160-2
pubmed: 1826624
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;95(12):27-30
pubmed: 21449264
In Vivo. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):295-300
pubmed: 25792660
Panminerva Med. 2000 Mar;42(1):87-90
pubmed: 11019611
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 2;164(3):137-45
pubmed: 26784672
Ann Surg. 1993 May;217(5):557-64; discussion 564-5
pubmed: 8489319
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:635461
pubmed: 24790759
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):42-9
pubmed: 21962732
Am Surg. 2017 Oct 1;83(10):1068-1073
pubmed: 29391097
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):629-38
pubmed: 23192170
World J Surg. 2005 Nov;29(11):1476-82
pubmed: 16228923
Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):747-52
pubmed: 25125096
World J Surg. 2013 Jan;37(1):113-22
pubmed: 23052797
JSLS. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3):
pubmed: 27493468
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52
pubmed: 14685099
Chest. 1996 Sep;110(3):810-5
pubmed: 8797429
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jul 15;8(7):573-82
pubmed: 27559437
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Sep 21;4(3):321-3
pubmed: 26557989
Am J Surg. 1994 Feb;167(2):281-6
pubmed: 8135322
Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9
pubmed: 19841366
Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):793-9
pubmed: 18948806
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;5(3):196-205
pubmed: 26557490
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Aug;77(2):338-50
pubmed: 25058263
Ann Med. 1996 Dec;28(6):483-9
pubmed: 9017107