Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Mortality in Lupus.
Journal
Arthritis care & research
ISSN: 2151-4658
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
05
05
2018
accepted:
21
08
2018
pubmed:
26
8
2018
medline:
29
2
2020
entrez:
26
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Physician-assessed disease activity and damage predict mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are known predictors of mortality in other chronic diseases, but this relationship has not been well examined in SLE. The aim of the present study was to assess whether PROs predict mortality in SLE. Data were derived from the University of California at San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study (n = 728). PROs (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36] subscales), self-rated health, and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale [CES-D]) from 2007 (baseline data [T0]) were used to predict mortality (censored 2015). Univariate Cox regression analyses were completed for each PRO as a predictor of mortality, and multivariate Cox regression with covariates for each PRO separately. Covariates were age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty, disease duration, disease activity (Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire), and damage (Brief Index of Lupus Damage). The mean ± SD age of patients was 50.6 ± 12.6 years. Ninety-two percent of patients were women and 68.5% were white. There were 71 deaths (9.1%). In univariate analyses, both the SF-36 physical component subscale score and self-rated health were associated with mortality, and the SF-36 mental health subscale and CES-D scores were not associated with mortality. In multivariate analyses, lower scores of SF-36 physical function at T0 independently predicted mortality after controlling for all other covariates (hazard ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99]; P < 0.01). Patient-reported physical function independently predicted mortality in SLE, even after accounting for demographics (including poverty) and disease (duration, activity, and damage). Because PROs are easy to assess, they may be used to triage, track, and guide early interventions for those at high risk of mortality in SLE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30144293
doi: 10.1002/acr.23734
pmc: PMC6387860
mid: NIHMS986661
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1028-1035Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P60 AR053308
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR056476
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.
Références
J Rheumatol. 2000 Feb;27(2):373-6
pubmed: 10685799
J Rheumatol. 2000 Mar;27(3):675-9
pubmed: 10743807
Lupus. 2000;9(5):322-7
pubmed: 10878722
J Rheumatol. 2000 Aug;27(8):1892-5
pubmed: 10955329
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Apr;45(2):191-202
pubmed: 11324784
J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29(2):288-91
pubmed: 11838846
Circulation. 2002 Jul 2;106(1):43-9
pubmed: 12093768
Lupus. 2003;12(4):280-6
pubmed: 12729051
Autoimmun Rev. 2004 Aug;3(6):423-53
pubmed: 15351310
Lupus. 2004;13(12):924-6
pubmed: 15645747
J Rheumatol. 2005 Sep;32(9):1706-8
pubmed: 16142864
Medicine (Baltimore). 2006 May;85(3):147-56
pubmed: 16721257
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2550-7
pubmed: 16868977
Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Mar;26(3):423-8
pubmed: 17216369
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 May 15;57(4):576-84
pubmed: 17471524
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug 15;57(6):986-92
pubmed: 17665468
Lupus. 2007;16(11):908-14
pubmed: 17971366
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15;59(1):136-43
pubmed: 18163398
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Apr;68(4):477-83
pubmed: 18434449
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):867-76
pubmed: 18553154
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May;48(5):542-5
pubmed: 19233884
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;36(6):1209-16
pubmed: 19369452
Acta Reumatol Port. 2009 Apr-Jun;34(2A):207-11
pubmed: 19474775
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jun;63(6):884-90
pubmed: 21312347
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1170-7
pubmed: 21584946
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3248-54
pubmed: 22523116
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1326-33
pubmed: 22588825
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jul;21(7):892-8
pubmed: 23242910
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;43(3):352-61
pubmed: 23786872
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;65(12):3017-25
pubmed: 24284967
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jul;66(7):1057-62
pubmed: 24376263
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;12(6):358-70
pubmed: 25754949
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016 May;42(2):253-263
pubmed: 27133488
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jul;31(7):1013-9
pubmed: 27365996
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Aug 29;5(9):
pubmed: 27572824
J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):248-257
pubmed: 27909087
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jan;70(1):125-133
pubmed: 28320078
Lupus. 2018 Feb;27(2):179-189
pubmed: 28587586
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;13(8):453-454
pubmed: 28660907
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 10;14(7):e1002346
pubmed: 28692670
Lupus. 2018 Mar;27(3):407-416
pubmed: 28795653
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jul;70(7):1101-1106
pubmed: 28973834
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 1;57(2):337-344
pubmed: 29121273
Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271-7
pubmed: 7138600
J Rheumatol. 1995 Jul;22(7):1265-70
pubmed: 7562756
Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63
pubmed: 8450681
J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21-37
pubmed: 9097506
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):373-80
pubmed: 9134792
J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):504-7
pubmed: 9972996