Anticoagulation Reversal and Risk of Thromboembolic Events Among Heart Transplant Recipients Bridged with Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
Adult
Aged
Anticoagulants
/ adverse effects
Blood Coagulation Factors
/ therapeutic use
Factor VIIa
/ therapeutic use
Female
Heart Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Heart-Assist Devices
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Recombinant Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Thromboembolism
/ etiology
Journal
ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
ISSN: 1538-943X
Titre abrégé: ASAIO J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9204109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
29
8
2018
medline:
13
5
2020
entrez:
29
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anticoagulation reversal agents (ARAs) can minimize bleeding complications associated with mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) explantation at the time of heart transplantation (HT); data on thromboembolic (TE) risk associated with ARAs are limited in this patient population. In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed 118 consecutive adults who were supported with durable MCSDs and underwent HT between May 2013 and October 2016. Patients were categorized based on intraoperative use of ARAs (recombinant factor VIIa [n=23], 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate [n=48], or factor IX complex [n=2]) at the time of HT; these agents were used at discretion of implanting surgeons for bleeding control. The primary outcome of interest was presence of venous or systemic TE events within 3 months of HT. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess association between TE events and use of ARAs. A total of 71 (60%) patients received ARAs, and a total of 32 patients (27.1%) had TE events (25 venous [median time to diagnosis: 11.5 days; interquartile range {IQR}: 9-31 days], and 10 systemic [median time to diagnosis: 5.5 days; IQR: 4-8 days]); 26 (81.2%) of those with TE events had ARAs used at the time of HT. Multivariable analysis identified use of ARAs as an independent predictor of TE events (multivariable odds ratio: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.09-8.58; p = 0.034). Unplanned intraoperative use of ARAs to control bleeding was associated with a significantly higher risk of TE events among HT recipients bridged with durable MCSD. Future studies are required to further assess safety of these agents and their impact on patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30153198
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000866
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Blood Coagulation Factors
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
prothrombin complex concentrates
37224-63-8
recombinant FVIIa
AC71R787OV
Factor VIIa
EC 3.4.21.21
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM