Assessment of NETest Clinical Utility in a U.S. Registry-Based Study.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 28 11 2017
accepted: 09 04 2018
pubmed: 31 8 2018
medline: 21 7 2020
entrez: 31 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical relevance of molecular biomarkers in oncology management has been recognized in breast and lung cancers. We evaluated a blood-based multigene assay for management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in a real-world study (U.S. registry NCT02270567). Diagnostic accuracy and relationship to clinical disease status in two cohorts (treated and watch-and-wait) were evaluated. Patients with NETs ( NETest diagnostic accuracy was 96% and concordant (95%) with image-demonstrable disease. Scores were reproducible (97%) and concordant with clinical status (98%). The NETest was the only feature linked to PFS (odds ratio, 6.1; Blood NETest is an accurate diagnostic and can be of use in monitoring disease status and facilitating management change in both watch-and-wait and treatment cohorts. A circulating multigene molecular biomarker to guide neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management has been developed because current biomarkers have limited clinical utility. NETest is diagnostic (96%) and in real time defines the disease status (>95%) as stable or progressive. It is >90% effective in guiding treatment decisions in conjunction with diagnostic imaging. Monitoring was effective in watch-and-wait or treatment groups. Low levels supported no management change and reduced the need for imaging. High levels indicated the need for management intervention. Real-time liquid biopsy assessment of NETs has clinical utility and can contribute additional value to patient management strategies and outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The clinical relevance of molecular biomarkers in oncology management has been recognized in breast and lung cancers. We evaluated a blood-based multigene assay for management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in a real-world study (U.S. registry NCT02270567). Diagnostic accuracy and relationship to clinical disease status in two cohorts (treated and watch-and-wait) were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients with NETs (
RESULTS
NETest diagnostic accuracy was 96% and concordant (95%) with image-demonstrable disease. Scores were reproducible (97%) and concordant with clinical status (98%). The NETest was the only feature linked to PFS (odds ratio, 6.1;
CONCLUSION
Blood NETest is an accurate diagnostic and can be of use in monitoring disease status and facilitating management change in both watch-and-wait and treatment cohorts.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
A circulating multigene molecular biomarker to guide neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management has been developed because current biomarkers have limited clinical utility. NETest is diagnostic (96%) and in real time defines the disease status (>95%) as stable or progressive. It is >90% effective in guiding treatment decisions in conjunction with diagnostic imaging. Monitoring was effective in watch-and-wait or treatment groups. Low levels supported no management change and reduced the need for imaging. High levels indicated the need for management intervention. Real-time liquid biopsy assessment of NETs has clinical utility and can contribute additional value to patient management strategies and outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30158287
pii: theoncologist.2017-0623
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0623
pmc: PMC6656500
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02270567']

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

783-790

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press 2018.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Références

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;53(3):631-639
pubmed: 29145657
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;110(8):1223-32
pubmed: 26032155
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016 Feb;23(1):28-37
pubmed: 26627724
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Nov;100(11):E1437-45
pubmed: 26348352
PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e63364
pubmed: 23691035
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1309-1315
pubmed: 28327907
Surgery. 2016 Jan;159(1):336-47
pubmed: 26456125
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4233-42
pubmed: 23071236
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Oct;9(10):1443-8
pubmed: 25521397
Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;121(4):589-97
pubmed: 25312765
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2838-2847
pubmed: 28692382
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Jan;13(1):78-108
pubmed: 25583772
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014 Apr 28;21(3):R105-20
pubmed: 24351682
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1282-9
pubmed: 18780869
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):e435-e446
pubmed: 26370353
Neuroendocrinology. 2017 Apr 8;105(3):201-211
pubmed: 28391265
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014 Aug;21(4):615-28
pubmed: 25015994
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jun;47:32-45
pubmed: 27236421
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2420-31
pubmed: 9196158
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr 21;19(15):2348-54
pubmed: 23613628
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):125-135
pubmed: 28076709
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3484-3515
pubmed: 28806116
Neuroendocrinology. 2017;104(2):170-182
pubmed: 27078712
Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):757-73
pubmed: 15492556
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):934-43
pubmed: 21263089
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015 Aug;22(4):561-75
pubmed: 26037279
Pancreas. 2017 Jul;46(6):707-714
pubmed: 28609356
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 May;43(5):839-851
pubmed: 26596723
J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 5;28(2):61-66
pubmed: 29093355
Endocr Connect. 2016 Sep;5(5):174-87
pubmed: 27582247

Auteurs

Eric Liu (E)

Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Scott Paulson (S)

Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Anthony Gulati (A)

Bennett Cancer Center, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.

Jon Freudman (J)

Freudman Healthcare Consulting, San Rafael, California, USA.

William Grosh (W)

Emily Couric Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Sheldon Kafer (S)

Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.

Prasanna C Wickremesinghe (PC)

Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, New York, USA.

Ronald R Salem (RR)

Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Lisa Bodei (L)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA bodeil@mskcc.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH