Small pulmonary granuloma is often misdiagnosed as lung cancer by positron emission tomography/computer tomography in diabetic patients.
Diabetes
Lung cancer
Misdiagnosis
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Small pulmonary granuloma
Journal
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1569-9285
Titre abrégé: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101158399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2019
01 03 2019
Historique:
received:
21
06
2018
revised:
21
07
2018
accepted:
28
07
2018
pubmed:
31
8
2018
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
31
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A small pulmonary granuloma (SPG) is often misdiagnosed as lung cancer in diabetic patients by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The present study was conducted to investigate whether diabetes is the influencing factor and to determine other related factors that have an impact on the diagnostic results following PET/CT examination. All clinical, imaging and pathological data of patients diagnosed with pulmonary nodules by PET/CT from January 2004 to December 2017 in our department were collected. Patients with an SPG who were wrongly diagnosed with lung cancer by PET/CT were enrolled (n = 79). The propensity score matching method was used to create a comparable control adenocarcinoma group (n = 395). Maximum standard uptake values, diabetes and fasting blood-glucose (FBG) were determined and analysed. The average maximum standard uptake values in the 2 groups were comparable (P = 0.801). Maximum standard uptake values in 5 subsections were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.135). The odds ratio (OR) of 3.326 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.671-6.623] for diabetes favoured misdiagnosis and was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in patients with high FBG levels (≥7.0 mmol/l), the risk of misdiagnosis of SPG increased significantly compared with normal FBG level (OR 2.601, 95% CI 1.174-5.761; P = 0.015). Diabetes and high FBG level were the influencing factors in the false-positive results of lung cancer by PET/CT examination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30165660
pii: 5084887
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy263
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
394-398Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.