The ideal timing for nail dynamization in femoral shaft delayed union and non-union.
Femoral delayed union
Femoral non-union
Femoral shaft fractures
Nail dynamization
Journal
International orthopaedics
ISSN: 1432-5195
Titre abrégé: Int Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7705431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
29
06
2018
accepted:
21
08
2018
pubmed:
1
9
2018
medline:
5
11
2019
entrez:
1
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nail dynamization is one of the proposed surgical options to manage femoral shaft non-union. This study aims to assess the efficacy and the ideal timing for dynamization in patients with femoral shaft delayed union or non-union. Sixty-eight patients (38 male and 30 female, mean age 36.85 years old, range 22-58) were recruited. The patients were divided into three groups according to the fracture healing time: groupa A, fracture healing occurred within nine months; group B, fracture healing occurred between nine and 12 months; and group C, fracture healing after 12 months or secondary procedure needed for union. Callus-to-diaphysis ratio was calculated on femur X-rays at the time of dynamization. In 30 patients out of 68, the fracture healing was observed at nine month follow-up; in 26 patients, the fracture healed within 12 months; eight fractures healed in more than 12 months and only four fractures required a secondary procedure for union. Dynamization was successful in 64 patients out of 68 (94.12%). The mean callus-diaphysis ratio was significantly different in group A (p = 0.001) and in group B (p = 0.03), compared with group C. The timing of dynamization resulted significantly different between the three groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that nail dynamization should be performed between three and six months after trauma. The optimal callus-to-diaphysis ratio should be comprised between 1.47 and 1.19, at the time of dynamization. Nail dynamization revealed safe and effective in the treatment of femoral delayed union and non-union. It should be considered as a first-line treatment for femoral non-union or delayed union.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30167836
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4129-y
pii: 10.1007/s00264-018-4129-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-222Références
J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23(4):302-8
pubmed: 15981026
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Feb;16(2):88-97
pubmed: 18252839
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Sep;(234):188-94
pubmed: 3409576
Int Orthop. 2018 Nov;42(11):2675-2683
pubmed: 29516238
J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):263-7
pubmed: 9291371
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):980-8
pubmed: 21741650
Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1747-52
pubmed: 22841533
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):247-258
pubmed: 29273837
Int Orthop. 2005 Apr;29(2):101-4
pubmed: 15714303
Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Dec;68(6):537-40
pubmed: 9462352
Orthopedics. 2016 Nov 1;39(6):e1117-e1123
pubmed: 27575039
Aktuelle Traumatol. 1989 Aug;19(4):162-8
pubmed: 2572157
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Apr;102(2):175-81
pubmed: 26826804
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Jul;16(6):394-402
pubmed: 12142827
Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2199-2203
pubmed: 28770293
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Mar;(372):241-9
pubmed: 10738433
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2013 Aug;8(2):77-88
pubmed: 23892497
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Oct;66(8):1222-35
pubmed: 6490697
Can J Surg. 1993 Aug;36(4):302-6
pubmed: 8370009
Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1735-1739
pubmed: 26572884