Cost Comparison of Single-Use Versus Reusable Bronchoscopes Used for Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy.
Journal
PharmacoEconomics - open
ISSN: 2509-4254
Titre abrégé: Pharmacoecon Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101700780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
9
2018
medline:
1
9
2018
entrez:
1
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Both single-use and reusable bronchoscopes are suitable for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) to visualise the trachea during the insertion process. To determine the least costly option, the price of single-use bronchoscopes must be weighed against the estimated average cost of a bronchoscopy with reusable equipment. In the latter case, the acquisition cost must be spread over the equipment's useful life and other relevant costs, such as reprocessing and repair, must be included. This study aimed to calculate the cost of using single-use or reusable bronchoscopes per PDT procedure. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing the costs of reusable and single-use bronchoscopes for PDT. Inclusion criteria were articles assessing the cost of single-use or reusable bronchoscopes, and where costs were divided into acquisition, reprocessing, and repair costs. A questionnaire regarding repair rates and costs for reusable bronchoscopes was sent to 366 hospitals in the US, UK, and Germany to supplement the identified literature. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-nine completed responses were received, of which 31 hospitals used reusable equipment for PDT. Literature research revealed an average acquisition cost of $US135 (SD 152) and reprocessing cost of $US123 (SD 128). Additionally, a combination of data from the literature and the questionnaires gave a repair cost per use of $US148 (SD 242), resulting in a total average cost of $US406 for reusable bronchoscopes and $US249 (SD 36) for single-use bronchoscopes per PDT procedure. Thus, the incremental cost per use of a reusable bronchoscope compared with a single-use bronchoscope was $US157. We conclude that significant savings can be made by using single-use bronchoscopes to guide PDT in preference to reusable bronchoscopes. Results depend on hospital setting, the reprocessing procedures, annual bronchoscope procedures, individual repair cost, and repair rates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Both single-use and reusable bronchoscopes are suitable for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) to visualise the trachea during the insertion process. To determine the least costly option, the price of single-use bronchoscopes must be weighed against the estimated average cost of a bronchoscopy with reusable equipment. In the latter case, the acquisition cost must be spread over the equipment's useful life and other relevant costs, such as reprocessing and repair, must be included.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to calculate the cost of using single-use or reusable bronchoscopes per PDT procedure.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing the costs of reusable and single-use bronchoscopes for PDT. Inclusion criteria were articles assessing the cost of single-use or reusable bronchoscopes, and where costs were divided into acquisition, reprocessing, and repair costs. A questionnaire regarding repair rates and costs for reusable bronchoscopes was sent to 366 hospitals in the US, UK, and Germany to supplement the identified literature.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-nine completed responses were received, of which 31 hospitals used reusable equipment for PDT. Literature research revealed an average acquisition cost of $US135 (SD 152) and reprocessing cost of $US123 (SD 128). Additionally, a combination of data from the literature and the questionnaires gave a repair cost per use of $US148 (SD 242), resulting in a total average cost of $US406 for reusable bronchoscopes and $US249 (SD 36) for single-use bronchoscopes per PDT procedure. Thus, the incremental cost per use of a reusable bronchoscope compared with a single-use bronchoscope was $US157.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that significant savings can be made by using single-use bronchoscopes to guide PDT in preference to reusable bronchoscopes. Results depend on hospital setting, the reprocessing procedures, annual bronchoscope procedures, individual repair cost, and repair rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30167996
doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0091-2
pii: 10.1007/s41669-018-0091-2
pmc: PMC6533350
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
189-195Références
Surgery. 1995 Nov;118(5):879-83
pubmed: 7482276
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1553-6
pubmed: 22182866
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb;142(2):143-9
pubmed: 26720516
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):3
pubmed: 28050896
Laryngoscope. 2016 Nov;126(11):2459-2467
pubmed: 27075530
J Clin Anesth. 2011 Dec;23(8):632-5
pubmed: 22137515
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Jun;1(2):133-141
pubmed: 29442335
Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31
pubmed: 21447488
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):270-81
pubmed: 22188176
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):577-84
pubmed: 22338623
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3):C5042
pubmed: 25748872
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Mar;129(3):212-6
pubmed: 25645673
Ann Pharm Fr. 2017 Nov;75(6):473-479
pubmed: 28818319
Clin Endosc. 2015 Sep;48(5):356-60
pubmed: 26473115
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 May;32(5):291-5
pubmed: 23561716
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2017 Apr;24(2):136-143
pubmed: 28323727
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):402-4
pubmed: 19138306
Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9
pubmed: 3996056
Anaesthesia. 2015 Jun;70(6):699-706
pubmed: 25644476