Validity of World Health Organisation prescribing indicators in Namibia's primary healthcare: findings and implications.
Ambulatory Care
/ methods
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Drugs, Generic
/ administration & dosage
Guideline Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Namibia
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Primary Health Care
/ methods
Surveys and Questionnaires
World Health Organization
INRUD criteria
Namibia
prescribing indicators
primary healthcare
validity
Journal
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2019
01 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
06
02
2017
revised:
03
06
2018
accepted:
26
07
2018
pubmed:
1
9
2018
medline:
23
10
2019
entrez:
1
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
World Health Organization/International Network of Rational use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) indicators are widely used to assess medicine use. However, there is limited evidence on their validity in Namibia's primary health care (PHC) to assess the quality of prescribing. Consequently, our aim was to address this. An analytical cross-sectional survey design was used to examine and validate WHO/INRUD indicators in out-patient units of two PHC facilities and one hospital in Namibia from 1 February 2015 to 31 July 2015. The validity of the indicators was determined using two-by-two tables against compliance to the Namibian standard treatment guidelines (NSTG). The receiver operator characteristics for the WHO/INRUD indicators were plotted to determine their accuracy as predictors of compliance to agreed standards. A multivariate logistic model was constructed to independently determine the prediction of each indicator. Out of 1243 prescriptions; compliance to NSTG prescribing in ambulatory care was sub-optimal (target was >80%). Three of the four WHO/INRUD indicators did not meet Namibian or WHO targets: antibiotic prescribing, average number of medicines per prescription and generic prescribing. The majority of the indicators had low sensitivity and/or specificity. All WHO/INRUD indicators had poor accuracy in predicting rational prescribing. The antibiotic prescribing indicator was the only covariate that was a significant independent risk factor for compliance to NSTGs. WHO/INRUD indicators showed poor accuracy in assessing prescribing practices in ambulatory care in Namibia. There is need for appropriate models and/or criteria to optimize medicine use in ambulatory care in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30169688
pii: 5085497
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy172
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Drugs, Generic
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
338-345Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.