Do we know how best to disinfect child care sites in the United States? A review of available disinfectant efficacy data and health risks of the major disinfectant classes.


Journal

American journal of infection control
ISSN: 1527-3296
Titre abrégé: Am J Infect Control
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8004854

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 13 02 2018
revised: 24 06 2018
accepted: 25 06 2018
pubmed: 3 9 2018
medline: 21 1 2020
entrez: 3 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Children in child care settings have a high infectious burden. They are frequently exposed to sanitizing and disinfecting agents, whose toxicities have not been studied in these settings. Current guidance on the preferred disinfection agents for child care is vague. This article combines 2 different sources of information: the Environmental Protection Agency registration data on the efficacy of hospital-grade disinfectants and a review of the research on the toxicities of the most common of these disinfectants to summarize information that could be used for more evidence-based early care and education disinfection regulations and guidelines. Coverage of these organisms varied both between disinfectant classes (defined by active ingredient), as well as within classes. The 3 most common active ingredients in the database-quaternary ammonias, bleaches, and hydrogen peroxides-had 251, 63, and 31 products, respectively. Quaternary ammonias and bleaches are both known asthmagens, with the potential for toxic gas release when mixed. Quaternary ammonias may also cause reproductive toxicity. Disinfectant-grade peroxides have relatively low inhalational toxicity. A clear rationale is needed to establish policies for determining preferable disinfection products for use in child care settings, based on efficacy against relevant pathogens, toxicity, ease of use, and cost. When other factors are equal, the use of peroxide-based disinfectant products is recommended to minimize inhalational toxicity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Children in child care settings have a high infectious burden. They are frequently exposed to sanitizing and disinfecting agents, whose toxicities have not been studied in these settings. Current guidance on the preferred disinfection agents for child care is vague.
METHODS
This article combines 2 different sources of information: the Environmental Protection Agency registration data on the efficacy of hospital-grade disinfectants and a review of the research on the toxicities of the most common of these disinfectants to summarize information that could be used for more evidence-based early care and education disinfection regulations and guidelines.
RESULTS
Coverage of these organisms varied both between disinfectant classes (defined by active ingredient), as well as within classes. The 3 most common active ingredients in the database-quaternary ammonias, bleaches, and hydrogen peroxides-had 251, 63, and 31 products, respectively. Quaternary ammonias and bleaches are both known asthmagens, with the potential for toxic gas release when mixed. Quaternary ammonias may also cause reproductive toxicity. Disinfectant-grade peroxides have relatively low inhalational toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
A clear rationale is needed to establish policies for determining preferable disinfection products for use in child care settings, based on efficacy against relevant pathogens, toxicity, ease of use, and cost. When other factors are equal, the use of peroxide-based disinfectant products is recommended to minimize inhalational toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30172610
pii: S0196-6553(18)30731-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.06.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Disinfectants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

82-91

Subventions

Organisme : ATSDR CDC HHS
ID : U61 TS000238
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Stephanie M Holm (SM)

University of California San Francisco Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, San Francisco, CA; University of California Berkeley Division of Epidemiology, Berkeley, CA; University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA. Electronic address: stephanie.holm@ucsf.edu.

Victoria Leonard (V)

Western States Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit-University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Timur Durrani (T)

University of California San Francisco Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Western States Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit-University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; California Poison Control System, San Francisco, CA.

Mark D Miller (MD)

University of California San Francisco Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Western States Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit-University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH