Regorafenib for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed After Standard Therapy: Results of the Large, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase IIIb CONSIGN Study.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 05 02 2018
accepted: 02 07 2018
pubmed: 8 9 2018
medline: 21 3 2020
entrez: 8 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization. This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation. In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand-foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3-4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6-2.7). In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT (

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization.
METHODS
This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation.
RESULTS
In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand-foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3-4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6-2.7).
CONCLUSION
In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT (

Identifiants

pubmed: 30190299
pii: theoncologist.2018-0072
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072
pmc: PMC6369948
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phenylurea Compounds 0
Pyridines 0
regorafenib 24T2A1DOYB

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01538680']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

185-192

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press 2018.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Références

BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 07;16:412
pubmed: 27389564
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):303-12
pubmed: 23177514
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2015 Aug;13(8):514-7
pubmed: 26351814
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):619-29
pubmed: 25981818
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):837-46
pubmed: 24337717
Int J Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;129(1):245-55
pubmed: 21170960
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jun;15(6):804-834
pubmed: 28596261
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):937-48
pubmed: 26184520
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):806-15
pubmed: 21544079
Target Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(3):445-7
pubmed: 25548130
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959

Auteurs

Eric Van Cutsem (E)

Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium eric.vancutsem@uzleuven.be.

Erika Martinelli (E)

Department of Experimental Medicine, Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Stefano Cascinu (S)

Clinica di Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.

Alberto Sobrero (A)

Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino IST, Genova, Italy.

Maria Banzi (M)

Department of Oncology and Advanced Technologies, Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Nuova/IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Jean-François Seitz (JF)

Department of Digestive Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.

Carlo Barone (C)

Medical Oncology, University Hospital A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.

Marc Ychou (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.

Marc Peeters (M)

Center for Oncological Research, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Baruch Brenner (B)

Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Ralf Dieter Hofheinz (RD)

Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Evaristo Maiello (E)

Department of Oncology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

Thierry André (T)

Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris and Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, Paris, France.

Andrea Spallanzani (A)

Department of Oncology and Haematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.

Rocio Garcia-Carbonero (R)

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Sevilla, Spain.

Yull E Arriaga (YE)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Udit Verma (U)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Axel Grothey (A)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Christian Kappeler (C)

Clinical Statistics, Global Clinical Oncology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.

Ashok Miriyala (A)

Benefit Risk Management, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.

Joachim Kalmus (J)

Development, Oncology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.

Alfredo Falcone (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Alberto Zaniboni (A)

Department of Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH