Pharmacokinetics of Dexmedetomidine in Infants and Children After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
Adolescent
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
/ administration & dosage
Child
Child, Preschool
Dexmedetomidine
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
/ administration & dosage
Infant
Infusions, Intravenous
Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
International Normalized Ratio
Liver Transplantation
Male
Metabolic Clearance Rate
Models, Biological
Journal
Anesthesia and analgesia
ISSN: 1526-7598
Titre abrégé: Anesth Analg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1310650
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
11
9
2018
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
11
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative and analgesic medication that is frequently used postoperatively in children after liver transplantation. Hepatic dysfunction, including alterations in drug clearance, is common immediately after liver transplantation. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DEX in this population is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the PK profile of DEX in children after liver transplantation. This was a single-center, open-label PK study of DEX administered as an intravenous loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. Twenty subjects, 1 month to 18 years of age, who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit after liver transplantation were enrolled. Whole blood was collected and analyzed for DEX concentration using a dried blood spot method. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to characterize the population PK of DEX. DEX PK was best described by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination. A typical child after liver transplantation with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 was found to have a whole blood DEX clearance of 52 L/h (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-73 L/h). In addition, intercompartmental clearance was 246 L/h (95% CI, 139-391 L/h), central volume of distribution was 186 L/70 kg (95% CI, 140-301 L/70 kg), and peripheral volume of distribution was 203 L (95% CI, 123-338 L). Interindividual variability ranged from 11% to 111% for all parameters. Clearance was not found to be associated with weight but was found to be inversely proportional to INR. An increase in INR to 3.2 resulted in a 50% decrease in DEX clearance. Weight was linearly correlated with central volume of distribution. All other covariates, including age, ischemic time, total bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase, were not found to be significant predictors of DEX disposition. Children who received DEX after liver transplantation have large variability in clearance, which was not found to be associated with weight but is influenced by underlying liver function, as reflected by INR. In this population, titration of DEX dosing to clinical effect may be important because weight-based dosing is poorly associated with blood concentrations. More attention to quality of DEX sedation may be warranted when INR values are changing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative and analgesic medication that is frequently used postoperatively in children after liver transplantation. Hepatic dysfunction, including alterations in drug clearance, is common immediately after liver transplantation. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DEX in this population is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the PK profile of DEX in children after liver transplantation.
METHODS
This was a single-center, open-label PK study of DEX administered as an intravenous loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. Twenty subjects, 1 month to 18 years of age, who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit after liver transplantation were enrolled. Whole blood was collected and analyzed for DEX concentration using a dried blood spot method. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to characterize the population PK of DEX.
RESULTS
DEX PK was best described by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination. A typical child after liver transplantation with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 was found to have a whole blood DEX clearance of 52 L/h (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-73 L/h). In addition, intercompartmental clearance was 246 L/h (95% CI, 139-391 L/h), central volume of distribution was 186 L/70 kg (95% CI, 140-301 L/70 kg), and peripheral volume of distribution was 203 L (95% CI, 123-338 L). Interindividual variability ranged from 11% to 111% for all parameters. Clearance was not found to be associated with weight but was found to be inversely proportional to INR. An increase in INR to 3.2 resulted in a 50% decrease in DEX clearance. Weight was linearly correlated with central volume of distribution. All other covariates, including age, ischemic time, total bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase, were not found to be significant predictors of DEX disposition.
CONCLUSIONS
Children who received DEX after liver transplantation have large variability in clearance, which was not found to be associated with weight but is influenced by underlying liver function, as reflected by INR. In this population, titration of DEX dosing to clinical effect may be important because weight-based dosing is poorly associated with blood concentrations. More attention to quality of DEX sedation may be warranted when INR values are changing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30198929
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003761
pmc: PMC7654335
mid: NIHMS1638986
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
0
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Dexmedetomidine
67VB76HONO
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
209-216Subventions
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 RR025744
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003142
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Eur J Pediatr. 2006 Dec;165(12):819-29
pubmed: 16807729
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Dec;33(6):663-72
pubmed: 22105583
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep;8(5):419-24
pubmed: 17693909
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Jun;95(6):484-7
pubmed: 20501544
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;57(9):1174-1182
pubmed: 28444697
Am J Surg. 2001 Feb;181(2):160-6
pubmed: 11425059
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1234-8
pubmed: 27101480
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017 Jun;64(3):677-684
pubmed: 28502445
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Jun;43(3):315-24
pubmed: 27221375
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 May;27(5):629-33
pubmed: 2667599
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jun;61(6):655-61
pubmed: 9209248
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Dec;85(6):850-5
pubmed: 11732518
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;55(7):739-47
pubmed: 25721251
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;45(6):666-73
pubmed: 15901748
Clin Biochem. 2016 Sep;49(13-14):1035-46
pubmed: 27179588
Clin Liver Dis. 2017 Feb;21(1):181-196
pubmed: 27842771
Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Nov;19(11):1119-29
pubmed: 19708909
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011 Jan;10(1):55-66
pubmed: 20718689
Adv Anat Pathol. 2005 Jul;12(4):221-6
pubmed: 16096384
Transplantation. 2001 Sep 27;72(6):1056-61
pubmed: 11579300
Anesth Analg. 2010 May 1;110(5):1383-92
pubmed: 20418300
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Aug;33(8):579-87
pubmed: 23839483
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008 Oct 15;874(1-2):33-41
pubmed: 18805072
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):460-8
pubmed: 22277665
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 16;2014:805013
pubmed: 24558330
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1556-66
pubmed: 26218862
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Feb;36(1):54-61
pubmed: 24081207
Liver Transpl. 2003 Oct;9(10):1005-18
pubmed: 14526393
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(3):231-43
pubmed: 26809188
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Oct;63(4):375-9
pubmed: 2818915
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Oct;58(4):367-77
pubmed: 15373929
Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1098-110
pubmed: 17122572