The Influence of Side Effect Information Framing on Nocebo Effects.


Journal

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
ISSN: 1532-4796
Titre abrégé: Ann Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8510246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 06 2019
Historique:
received: 12 04 2018
revised: 07 06 2018
accepted: 20 08 2018
pubmed: 12 9 2018
medline: 10 7 2020
entrez: 12 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

One contributing factor to the development of nocebo effects is information provided about possible side effects. However, nondisclosure of information can be problematic. We assessed whether positively framed side effect information (highlighting likelihood of not experiencing side effects) can reduce nocebo effects compared to negatively framed information (highlighting likelihood of experiencing side effects). One hundred twelve participants took part in research ostensibly assessing the influence of benzodiazepines (actually sham capsules) on anxiety. Participants were randomized to receive a sham capsule with positively or negatively framed information about four side effects, or a no-treatment control condition. Side effect expectations were assessed after information provision. Framed side effects and other unmentioned symptoms were assessed during the session and 24-hr follow-up. Nocebo effects occurred in symptoms presented as side effects (regardless of framing) during the study session and follow-up (ps < .003). At follow-up, there was also a nocebo effect in other unmentioned symptoms (p = .018). Positive framing reduced side effect symptoms compared with negative framing during the study session (p = .037), but this effect was no longer present at follow-up (p = .53). Side effect expectations did not differ between the framing conditions (p = .14). Positive framing reduced side effects short-term, but not at follow-up. Expectations did not differ between negative and positive framing. Nocebo effects appeared to generalize to other unmentioned symptoms over a 24-hr period. Further research is needed to determine whether the initial impact of positive framing can be maintained over time.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
One contributing factor to the development of nocebo effects is information provided about possible side effects. However, nondisclosure of information can be problematic.
PURPOSE
We assessed whether positively framed side effect information (highlighting likelihood of not experiencing side effects) can reduce nocebo effects compared to negatively framed information (highlighting likelihood of experiencing side effects).
METHODS
One hundred twelve participants took part in research ostensibly assessing the influence of benzodiazepines (actually sham capsules) on anxiety. Participants were randomized to receive a sham capsule with positively or negatively framed information about four side effects, or a no-treatment control condition. Side effect expectations were assessed after information provision. Framed side effects and other unmentioned symptoms were assessed during the session and 24-hr follow-up.
RESULTS
Nocebo effects occurred in symptoms presented as side effects (regardless of framing) during the study session and follow-up (ps < .003). At follow-up, there was also a nocebo effect in other unmentioned symptoms (p = .018). Positive framing reduced side effect symptoms compared with negative framing during the study session (p = .037), but this effect was no longer present at follow-up (p = .53). Side effect expectations did not differ between the framing conditions (p = .14).
CONCLUSIONS
Positive framing reduced side effects short-term, but not at follow-up. Expectations did not differ between negative and positive framing. Nocebo effects appeared to generalize to other unmentioned symptoms over a 24-hr period. Further research is needed to determine whether the initial impact of positive framing can be maintained over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30204841
pii: 5094581
doi: 10.1093/abm/kay071
doi:

Substances chimiques

Placebos 0
Benzodiazepines 12794-10-4

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

621-629

Informations de copyright

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Kate Faasse (K)

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Anna Huynh (A)

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Sarah Pearson (S)

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Andrew L Geers (AL)

Department of Psychology, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

Suzanne G Helfer (SG)

Department of Psychology, Adrian College, Adrian, MI, USA.

Ben Colagiuri (B)

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH