Improved Dose Estimates for Fluoroscopically Guided Lumbar Epidural Injections.


Journal

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 15 9 2018
medline: 7 3 2020
entrez: 15 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The goal of the study was to determine the potential impact of system inaccuracies and table attenuation on fluoroscope-reported dose values. An Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted to collect detailed acquisition and patient exposure data for fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections. System-reported dosimetry values, especially the air Kinetic Energy Released per unit MAss and dose-area product metrics, are routinely used for estimating the radiation burden to patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided procedures. However, these metrics do not account for other factors, such as acquisition geometry, where the table may attenuate a substantial fraction of the x-ray intensity, and system dosimetry inaccuracies, which are only required to be accurate within ±35%. Acquisition data from 46 patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections were collected to better estimate the true incident dose-area product. Gantry angles, x-ray technique factors, and field sizes were collected to characterize each procedure. Additionally, the fluoroscope dosimetry accuracy and table attenuation properties were evaluated as a function of kVp to generate the correction factors necessary for accurate dosimetry estimates. The system-reported values overestimated the total patient entrance dose-area product by an average of 34% (13-44%). Errors may be substantially higher for systems with less accurate fluoroscopes or more anterior-posterior projections. Correcting system-reported dosimetry values for systematic inaccuracies and variability can substantially improve fluoroscopic dose values. Including corrections for system output inaccuracies and acquisition factors such as table attenuation is necessary for any reliable assessment of radiation burden to patients associated with fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE
The goal of the study was to determine the potential impact of system inaccuracies and table attenuation on fluoroscope-reported dose values.
DESIGN
An Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted to collect detailed acquisition and patient exposure data for fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections.
BACKGROUND
System-reported dosimetry values, especially the air Kinetic Energy Released per unit MAss and dose-area product metrics, are routinely used for estimating the radiation burden to patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided procedures. However, these metrics do not account for other factors, such as acquisition geometry, where the table may attenuate a substantial fraction of the x-ray intensity, and system dosimetry inaccuracies, which are only required to be accurate within ±35%.
METHODS
Acquisition data from 46 patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injections were collected to better estimate the true incident dose-area product. Gantry angles, x-ray technique factors, and field sizes were collected to characterize each procedure. Additionally, the fluoroscope dosimetry accuracy and table attenuation properties were evaluated as a function of kVp to generate the correction factors necessary for accurate dosimetry estimates.
RESULTS
The system-reported values overestimated the total patient entrance dose-area product by an average of 34% (13-44%). Errors may be substantially higher for systems with less accurate fluoroscopes or more anterior-posterior projections. Correcting system-reported dosimetry values for systematic inaccuracies and variability can substantially improve fluoroscopic dose values.
CONCLUSIONS
Including corrections for system output inaccuracies and acquisition factors such as table attenuation is necessary for any reliable assessment of radiation burden to patients associated with fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30215781
pii: 5095912
doi: 10.1093/pm/pny172
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenal Cortex Hormones 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

971-978

Informations de copyright

© 2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Steve D Mann (SD)

Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Anand Joshi (A)

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Megan Shonyo (M)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Jered R Wells (JR)

Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Jocelyn Hoye (J)

Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Robert Reiman (R)

Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Imaging Science and Innovation, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Radiation Safety Division, Occupational and Environmental Safety Office, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Ehsan Samei (E)

Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH