Mechanical performance of traditional distraction-based dual growing rod constructs.

Computational or finite element analysis model Early onset scoliosis Growing rod Mechanical or bench testing Pediatric Spinal instrumentation

Journal

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
ISSN: 1878-1632
Titre abrégé: Spine J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130732

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 17 05 2018
revised: 31 08 2018
accepted: 05 09 2018
pubmed: 17 9 2018
medline: 20 2 2020
entrez: 17 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Growing rod constructs are an important contribution in the treatment of children with early onset scoliosis even though these devices experience high rates of rod fracture. The mechanical performance of traditional, distraction-based dual growing rod constructs is not well understood, and mechanical models for predicting device performance are limited. Two mechanical models were developed and used to determine the mechanical performance of various growing rod configurations by increasing construct complexity. Mechanical bench testing and finite element (FE) analysis. Static and dynamic compression bending tests were based on an ASTM F1717 method modified to accommodate dual growing rod constructs. Six construct configurations were tested, mechanical properties were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed to determine significant differences between groups: (1) no connectors (rods only), (2) side-by-side connectors, (3) side-by-side connectors plus 4 crosslinks, (4) (40-mm long tandem connectors, (5) 80-mm long tandem connectors, and (6) 80-mm long tandem connectors plus 4 crosslinks. FE analysis was used to predict the stress distribution within the constructs. The static results indicated greater stiffness, yield load, and peak load as the axial connector length increased (side-by-side to 40 mm tandem to 80 mm tandem). The dynamic results showed similar cycles to failure for side-by-side and tandem connector (40 and 80 mm) construct configurations without crosslinks. Crosslinks shifted the location of rod fracture observed experimentally and significantly reduced the fatigue life of the construct. The flexibility of the construct decreased significantly as the axial connector length increased. FE predictions were highly consistent with the experimentally measured values and provided information on stress distribution within the rod for comparison to experimental fracture locations. This is the first study to evaluate mechanical performance of various configurations of pediatric growing rod constructs using preclinical models. The current study is consistent with a previous retrieval study in that rigid constructs lacking flexibility (ie, higher stiffness and lower displacement), such as those with 80-mm tandem connectors and multiple crosslinks, demonstrated decreased mechanical performance as shown through both experimental and computational models. Additionally, the experimental and computational findings suggest that surgeons should strategically consider the number of interconnecting components and subsequent stress concentrations along the posterior side of the rod. For example, changing the placement of crosslinks to low stress regions of the construct or not using crosslinks in the construct are options.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Growing rod constructs are an important contribution in the treatment of children with early onset scoliosis even though these devices experience high rates of rod fracture. The mechanical performance of traditional, distraction-based dual growing rod constructs is not well understood, and mechanical models for predicting device performance are limited.
PURPOSE
Two mechanical models were developed and used to determine the mechanical performance of various growing rod configurations by increasing construct complexity.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Mechanical bench testing and finite element (FE) analysis.
METHODS
Static and dynamic compression bending tests were based on an ASTM F1717 method modified to accommodate dual growing rod constructs. Six construct configurations were tested, mechanical properties were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed to determine significant differences between groups: (1) no connectors (rods only), (2) side-by-side connectors, (3) side-by-side connectors plus 4 crosslinks, (4) (40-mm long tandem connectors, (5) 80-mm long tandem connectors, and (6) 80-mm long tandem connectors plus 4 crosslinks. FE analysis was used to predict the stress distribution within the constructs.
RESULTS
The static results indicated greater stiffness, yield load, and peak load as the axial connector length increased (side-by-side to 40 mm tandem to 80 mm tandem). The dynamic results showed similar cycles to failure for side-by-side and tandem connector (40 and 80 mm) construct configurations without crosslinks. Crosslinks shifted the location of rod fracture observed experimentally and significantly reduced the fatigue life of the construct. The flexibility of the construct decreased significantly as the axial connector length increased. FE predictions were highly consistent with the experimentally measured values and provided information on stress distribution within the rod for comparison to experimental fracture locations.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to evaluate mechanical performance of various configurations of pediatric growing rod constructs using preclinical models. The current study is consistent with a previous retrieval study in that rigid constructs lacking flexibility (ie, higher stiffness and lower displacement), such as those with 80-mm tandem connectors and multiple crosslinks, demonstrated decreased mechanical performance as shown through both experimental and computational models. Additionally, the experimental and computational findings suggest that surgeons should strategically consider the number of interconnecting components and subsequent stress concentrations along the posterior side of the rod. For example, changing the placement of crosslinks to low stress regions of the construct or not using crosslinks in the construct are options.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30219359
pii: S1529-9430(18)31132-X
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

744-754

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Genevieve Hill (G)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA; University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742. Electronic address: genevieve.mcrae@fda.hhs.gov.

Srinidhi Nagaraja (S)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Austin Bridges (A)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Ardalan Seyed Vosoughi (AS)

Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence, Department of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.

Vijay K Goel (VK)

Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence, Department of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.

Maureen L Dreher (ML)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Female Male Middle Aged Spinal Fusion
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena

Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics.

Andreas Fontalis, Daniel Buchalter, Fabio Mancino et al.
1.00
Humans Biomechanical Phenomena Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Spine Hip Prosthesis
Humans Range of Motion, Articular Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder Posture Female

Classifications MeSH