The Relative Association of Collective Efficacy in School and Neighborhood Contexts With Adolescent Alcohol Use.
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
/ ethnology
Alcohol Drinking
/ ethnology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Multilevel Analysis
Peer Influence
Residence Characteristics
/ statistics & numerical data
Schools
Self Efficacy
Socioeconomic Factors
Students
/ psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Underage Drinking
/ ethnology
Japan
alcohol consumption
high school students
multilevel model
social process
Journal
Journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1349-9092
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9607688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2019
05 Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
19
9
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
19
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unclear whether either neighborhood collective efficacy or school collective efficacy is associated with adolescent alcohol use. This study aimed to examine the relative contributions of collective efficacy, both in school and in the neighborhood contexts, to alcohol use among Japanese adolescents. A cross-sectional study was conducted in public high schools across Okinawa and Ibaraki Prefectures in Japan in 2016. The study participants consisted of 3,291 students in grades 10 through 12 cross-nested in 51 schools and 107 neighborhoods. Alcohol use was measured as current alcohol drinking, which was defined as self-reported drinking on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Collective efficacy was measured using scales of social cohesion and informal social control in school and the neighborhood. Contextual-level collective efficacy was measured using aggregated school-level and neighborhood-level individual responses, respectively. We used non-hierarchical multilevel models to fit the cross-nested data. Significant variation in alcohol use was shown between schools but not between neighborhoods. After adjusting for covariates, school collective efficacy at individual- and contextual-levels was protectively associated with alcohol drinking (odds ratio [OR] for the increase of one standard deviation from the mean 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.82 and OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75, respectively), whereas neighborhood collective efficacy at individual- and contextual-levels was not associated with alcohol consumption. The school-level associations of collective efficacy with adolescent alcohol use may have the greater impact than the neighborhood-level associations. Adolescent drinking prevention efforts should include enhancing school collective efficacy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether either neighborhood collective efficacy or school collective efficacy is associated with adolescent alcohol use. This study aimed to examine the relative contributions of collective efficacy, both in school and in the neighborhood contexts, to alcohol use among Japanese adolescents.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted in public high schools across Okinawa and Ibaraki Prefectures in Japan in 2016. The study participants consisted of 3,291 students in grades 10 through 12 cross-nested in 51 schools and 107 neighborhoods. Alcohol use was measured as current alcohol drinking, which was defined as self-reported drinking on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Collective efficacy was measured using scales of social cohesion and informal social control in school and the neighborhood. Contextual-level collective efficacy was measured using aggregated school-level and neighborhood-level individual responses, respectively. We used non-hierarchical multilevel models to fit the cross-nested data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Significant variation in alcohol use was shown between schools but not between neighborhoods. After adjusting for covariates, school collective efficacy at individual- and contextual-levels was protectively associated with alcohol drinking (odds ratio [OR] for the increase of one standard deviation from the mean 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.82 and OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75, respectively), whereas neighborhood collective efficacy at individual- and contextual-levels was not associated with alcohol consumption.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The school-level associations of collective efficacy with adolescent alcohol use may have the greater impact than the neighborhood-level associations. Adolescent drinking prevention efforts should include enhancing school collective efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30224580
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180125
pmc: PMC6737185
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
384-390Références
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):160-4
pubmed: 24402246
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Sep 01;166:243-8
pubmed: 27388759
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Sep;36(5):646-54
pubmed: 20456374
Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1690-5
pubmed: 21778475
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):732-40
pubmed: 25713969
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):2496-502
pubmed: 26469652
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jul 15;162(2):171-82
pubmed: 15972939
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Oct;25(10):1912-27
pubmed: 20023199
Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Summer;46(3 Suppl):S53-64
pubmed: 14563074
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Aug;62(8):752-8
pubmed: 18621963
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):299-306
pubmed: 21146276
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 Feb;33(2):247-54
pubmed: 18986382
Health Place. 2016 Sep;41:24-33
pubmed: 27521816
Health Place. 2013 May;21:70-85
pubmed: 23454663
Health Place. 2015 Jul;34:190-8
pubmed: 26071651
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Sep;43(9):1498-512
pubmed: 24170438
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(1):185-98
pubmed: 15847971
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):769-78
pubmed: 16039767
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;11(5):414-21
pubmed: 21795133
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Dec;24(12):2570-2577
pubmed: 27863090
Health Place. 2015 Jan;31:224-32
pubmed: 25579227
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24
pubmed: 9252316
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;119:81-7
pubmed: 25150654
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;115:10-20
pubmed: 24937324
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jan;36(1):45-52
pubmed: 22005718
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2093-102
pubmed: 21652063
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Jun 10;65(6):1-174
pubmed: 27280474
Subst Abuse. 2017 Jun 06;11:1178221817711417
pubmed: 28615949
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):290-7
pubmed: 16537344
J Sch Health. 2015 Dec;85(12):871-9
pubmed: 26522176
J Res Adolesc. 2017 Jun;27(2):362-378
pubmed: 28876530