Improved discrimination between normal-tension and primary open-angle glaucoma with advanced vascular examinations - the Leuven Eye Study.
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity
/ physiology
Diagnosis, Differential
Disease Progression
Female
Glaucoma, Open-Angle
/ diagnosis
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
/ physiology
Low Tension Glaucoma
/ diagnosis
Male
Nerve Fibers
/ pathology
ROC Curve
Retinal Ganglion Cells
/ pathology
Retinal Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Tonometry, Ocular
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
/ methods
diagnosis
glaucoma
normal-tension glaucoma
ocular blood flow
open-angle glaucoma
Journal
Acta ophthalmologica
ISSN: 1755-3768
Titre abrégé: Acta Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101468102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
27
12
2017
accepted:
05
04
2018
pubmed:
19
9
2018
medline:
20
2
2019
entrez:
19
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vascular factors have been suggested to influence the development and progression of glaucoma. They are thought to be especially relevant for normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. We aim to investigate which vascular factors, including advanced vascular examinations, better describe patients with NTG comparing to those with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The Leuven Eye Study database (182 NTG and 202 POAG patients; similar structural and functional damage) was used to compute three multivariate logistic regression models: a conventional model (conventional parameters only, including vascular-related self-reported phenomena, such as migraine or peripheral vasospasm); an advanced vascular model (advanced vascular parameters only: colour Doppler imaging (CDI), retinal oximetry, ocular pulse amplitude and choroidal thickness); and a global model, in which both types of parameters were allowed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and corresponding areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared between models. Patients with NTG had a higher resistive index and lower early systolic acceleration (ESA) in their retrobulbar vessels and a smaller arteriovenous retinal oxygen saturation difference. The global model (AUC 0.743) showed a significantly better discriminative ability when compared to either the conventional (AUC 0.687, p = 0.049) or the advanced vascular (AUC 0.677, p = 0.005) models. Also, the conventional and the advanced vascular models showed a similar discriminative ability (p = 0.823). Patients with NTG have more signs of vascular dysfunction. Clinical conventional parameters, such as asking simple vascular-related questions, combined with advanced vascular examinations provide information to better understand the value that non-IOP-related factors play in NTG.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e50-e56Informations de copyright
© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.