Detection of laminar resorption in osteo-odonto-keratoprostheses.


Journal

The ocular surface
ISSN: 1937-5913
Titre abrégé: Ocul Surf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156063

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 10 04 2018
revised: 12 09 2018
accepted: 14 09 2018
pubmed: 19 9 2018
medline: 2 6 2020
entrez: 19 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the clinical examination and computerized tomography (CT) scanning methods for the detection of laminar resorption in eyes with osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP). Patients who developed laminar resorption after OOKP surgery and had at least one CT scan of the lamina during the follow-up were included. Case records and CT images and reports were retrospectively reviewed. Each lamina of the eye was regarded as a case. The imaging and clinical data were collected in Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was performed on Stata-v14. The agreements and sensitivities of both the methods were compared. Forty patients out of 64 were found to have laminar resorption. A total of 48 laminae were studied, which had data on the presence or absence of resorption. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical detection of resorption were 87.5% (CI 68%-97%) and 37.5% (CI 8.5%-75.5%), respectively. Whereas, the sensitivity and specificity of CT scan were 81% (CI 61%-93%) and 50% (CI12%-88%), respectively. Both the methods have detected resorption in 21 out of 32 laminae having both the clinical and CT scan data. There is a fair agreement between the two techniques in the identification of thinned laminar sites. Clinical detection of laminar resorption in OOKP eyes is equally sensitive to the CT scanning. Resorption can be detected even in its early stages by clinical palpation in experienced hands. Frequent CT scanning is not indicated to detect laminar resorption. Both methods complement each other. Thinned laminar segments should be compared and correlated with both the methods for full evaluation of resorption.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30227262
pii: S1542-0124(18)30112-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.09.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

78-82

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Venkata S Avadhanam (VS)

Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK; Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Jonathan Smith (J)

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

Ali Poostchi (A)

Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Jordan Chervenkoff (J)

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

Nancy Al Raqqad (N)

Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, UK; Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Jordan.

Ian Francis (I)

Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

Christopher S Liu (CS)

Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK; Tongdean Eye Clinic, Brighton, UK. Electronic address: cscliu@aol.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH