Intra-operative imaging of surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcoma using optical coherence tomography.
dogs
margins of excision
surgical oncology
Journal
Veterinary and comparative oncology
ISSN: 1476-5829
Titre abrégé: Vet Comp Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101185242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
30
07
2018
revised:
12
09
2018
accepted:
13
09
2018
pubmed:
22
9
2018
medline:
28
2
2019
entrez:
22
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a rapid non-invasive imaging technique that has shown high sensitivity for intra-operative surgical margin assessment in human breast cancer clinical trials. This promising technology has not been evaluated in veterinary medicine. The objective of this study was to correlate normal and abnormal histological features with OCT images for surgical margins from excised canine soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to establish image evaluation criteria for identifying positive surgical margins. Fourteen client-owned dogs underwent surgical resection of a STS and OCT imaging of 2 to 4 areas of interest on the resected specimen were performed. Following imaging these areas were marked with surgical ink and trimmed for histopathology evaluation. Results showed that different tissue types had distinct characteristic appearances on OCT imaging. Adipose tissue exhibited a relatively low scattering and a honey-comb texture pattern. Skeletal muscle and sarcoma tissue were both dense and highly scattering. While sarcoma tissue was highly scattering, it did not have organized recognizable structure in contrast to muscle which showed clear fibre alignment patterns. In this investigation, we showed different tissue types had different and characteristic scattering and image texture appearances on OCT, which closely correlate with low-power histology images. Given the differentiation between tissue types the results support that OCT could be used to identify positive surgical margins immediately following resection of STS. Further research is needed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this method for surgical margin assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30239117
doi: 10.1111/vco.12448
pmc: PMC7274149
mid: NIHMS1595031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80-88Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA213149
Pays : United States
Organisme : Morris Animal Foundation
ID : D16FE-034
Organisme : National Science Foundation
Organisme : American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation
ID : 02204
Informations de copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;75(18):3706-12
pubmed: 26374464
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):834-42
pubmed: 22972654
Vet Pathol. 2009 Sep;46(5):928-33
pubmed: 19429989
Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 1998 Feb;13(1):59-64
pubmed: 9634350
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Mar-Apr;11(2):021014
pubmed: 16674189
Vet Surg. 2008 Jul;37(5):461-5
pubmed: 18986313
J Biomed Opt. 2014 Feb;19(2):21102
pubmed: 23807552
Vet Surg. 2016 Aug;45(6):715-22
pubmed: 27281113
Vet Pathol. 2011 Jan;48(1):19-31
pubmed: 21123864
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(6):1051-1060
pubmed: 28263385
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 May 15;240(10):1181-7
pubmed: 22559107
Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 15;75(20):4283-91
pubmed: 26471914
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Feb 15;230(4):548-54
pubmed: 17302554
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Nov 1;211(9):1147-51
pubmed: 9364229
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Mar;49(3):240-248
pubmed: 28319274
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2016 Mar-Apr;52(2):77-89
pubmed: 26808432
J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Nov;50(11):568-74
pubmed: 19814769
BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 23;16:144
pubmed: 26907742
Vet Pathol. 2011 Jan;48(1):73-84
pubmed: 21139143
Transl Res. 2016 Apr;170:73-88
pubmed: 26746803
Vet Surg. 2014 Oct;43(7):774-82
pubmed: 24724565
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Sep 04;5(10):3417-26
pubmed: 25360360
Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 15;69(22):8790-6
pubmed: 19910294