How does anteroposterior cup placement affect bone coverage and range of motion in primary total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia?
Acetabulum
/ diagnostic imaging
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ methods
Cohort Studies
Computer Simulation
Female
Femur Head
/ diagnostic imaging
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Dislocation, Congenital
/ complications
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip
/ diagnostic imaging
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
/ physiology
Recovery of Function
/ physiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
20
04
2018
revised:
20
08
2018
accepted:
27
08
2018
pubmed:
24
9
2018
medline:
25
7
2019
entrez:
24
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to anterior bone defects, high and/or posterior placement of an acetabular cup is often required to achieve sufficient coverage in patients with hip dysplasia. We examined whether posterior cup placement affected the postoperative range of motion (ROM) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Using computer software, bone coverage and ROM were examined in 32 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip with Crowe type II or III hip dysplasia. We determined the cup position to satisfy cup center-edge (Cup-CE) angle ≥0° and the required ROM. The cup was placed at the anatomic hip center and moved in 2-mm increments anteroposteriorly and 10-mm increments vertically. At vertical anatomic hip center, less than 68.8% hips fulfilled Cup-CE ≥0° regardless of anteroposterior position. Significantly more hips at higher hip center with posterior cup placement achieved Cup-CE ≥0° than hips at vertical anatomic hip center, and 10 mm higher hip center was the most suitable for achieving bone coverage. However, posterior and superior cup placement significantly decreased the flexion and IR due to early bone impingement, whereas ER and extension were not affected. A smoothing spline curve demonstrated that more posterior cup placement than 4.8 mm and 3.6 mm did not satisfy the required ROM at 10 mm and 20 mm higher hip center, respectively. Posterosuperior cup placement gained more bone coverage but decreased the range of hip flexion and internal rotation. Consequently, posterosuperior cup placement did not satisfy the required ROM.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Due to anterior bone defects, high and/or posterior placement of an acetabular cup is often required to achieve sufficient coverage in patients with hip dysplasia. We examined whether posterior cup placement affected the postoperative range of motion (ROM) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS
METHODS
Using computer software, bone coverage and ROM were examined in 32 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip with Crowe type II or III hip dysplasia. We determined the cup position to satisfy cup center-edge (Cup-CE) angle ≥0° and the required ROM. The cup was placed at the anatomic hip center and moved in 2-mm increments anteroposteriorly and 10-mm increments vertically.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At vertical anatomic hip center, less than 68.8% hips fulfilled Cup-CE ≥0° regardless of anteroposterior position. Significantly more hips at higher hip center with posterior cup placement achieved Cup-CE ≥0° than hips at vertical anatomic hip center, and 10 mm higher hip center was the most suitable for achieving bone coverage. However, posterior and superior cup placement significantly decreased the flexion and IR due to early bone impingement, whereas ER and extension were not affected. A smoothing spline curve demonstrated that more posterior cup placement than 4.8 mm and 3.6 mm did not satisfy the required ROM at 10 mm and 20 mm higher hip center, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Posterosuperior cup placement gained more bone coverage but decreased the range of hip flexion and internal rotation. Consequently, posterosuperior cup placement did not satisfy the required ROM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30243518
pii: S0949-2658(18)30243-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.019
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
269-274Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.