Measuring the patient experience in community mental health services for older people: A study of the Net Promoter Score using the Friends and Family Test in England.


Journal

International journal of geriatric psychiatry
ISSN: 1099-1166
Titre abrégé: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8710629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 16 03 2018
accepted: 06 08 2018
pubmed: 25 9 2018
medline: 14 8 2019
entrez: 25 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The research aimed to explore the value of the Net Promoter Score as a service improvement tool and an outcome measure. The study objectives were to (1) explore associations between the Net Promoter Score with patient and service-receipt characteristics; (2) evaluate the strength of association between the Net Promoter Score and a satisfaction score; and (3) evaluate its test-retest reliability. A postal survey was sent to service users on caseloads of community mental health teams for older people in four localities of England. The survey collected the Net Promoter Score, a single satisfaction question, and data on socio-demographics, clinical profile, and service receipt. Analysis used non-parametric tests of association and exploratory least squares regression. A second survey was administered for test-retest reliability analysis. Fieldwork concluded in April 2016. For 352 respondents, the Net Promoter Score was negatively related to age and was lowest for those still within 6 months of their initial referral. Receiving support from a psychiatrist and/or support worker was linked to higher scores. A strong but imperfect correlation coefficient with the satisfaction score indicates they evaluate related but distinct constructs. It had a reasonable test-retest reliability, with a weighted kappa of 0.706. Despite doubts over its validity in community mental health services, the Net Promoter Score may produce results of value to researchers, clinicians, service commissioners, and managers, if part of wider data collection. However, multi-item measures would provide greater breadth and improved reliability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30247775
doi: 10.1002/gps.4978
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

31-37

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2013-06-038
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Auteurs

Mark Wilberforce (M)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK.

Sarah Poll (S)

Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Heather Langham (H)

Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Angela Worden (A)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK.

David Challis (D)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH