Better together: A qualitative exploration of women's perceptions and experiences of group antenatal care.


Journal

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
ISSN: 1878-1799
Titre abrégé: Women Birth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101266131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 01 03 2018
revised: 09 09 2018
accepted: 09 09 2018
pubmed: 27 9 2018
medline: 5 11 2019
entrez: 27 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Childbearing women from socio-economically disadvantaged communities and minority ethnic groups are less likely to access antenatal care and experience more adverse pregnancy outcomes. Group antenatal care aims to facilitate information sharing and social support. It is associated with higher rates of attendance and improved health outcomes. To assess the acceptability of a bespoke model of group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) in an inner city community in England, understand how the model affects women's experiences of pregnancy and antenatal care, and inform further development and testing of the model. A two-stage qualitative study comprising focus groups with twenty six local women, followed by the implementation of four Pregnancy Circles attended by twenty four women, which were evaluated using observations, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with participants. Data were analysed thematically. Pregnancy Circles offered an appealing alternative to standard antenatal care and functioned as an instrument of empowerment, mediated through increased learning and knowledge sharing, active participation in care and peer and professional relationship building. Multiparous women and women from diverse cultures sharing their experiences during Circle sessions was particularly valued. Participants had mixed views about including partners in the sessions. Group antenatal care, in the form of Pregnancy Circles, is acceptable to women and appears to enhance their experiences of pregnancy. Further work needs to be done both to test the findings in larger, quantitative studies and to find a model of care that is acceptable to women and their partners.

Sections du résumé

PROBLEM OBJECTIVE
Childbearing women from socio-economically disadvantaged communities and minority ethnic groups are less likely to access antenatal care and experience more adverse pregnancy outcomes.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Group antenatal care aims to facilitate information sharing and social support. It is associated with higher rates of attendance and improved health outcomes.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To assess the acceptability of a bespoke model of group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) in an inner city community in England, understand how the model affects women's experiences of pregnancy and antenatal care, and inform further development and testing of the model.
METHODS METHODS
A two-stage qualitative study comprising focus groups with twenty six local women, followed by the implementation of four Pregnancy Circles attended by twenty four women, which were evaluated using observations, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with participants. Data were analysed thematically.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Pregnancy Circles offered an appealing alternative to standard antenatal care and functioned as an instrument of empowerment, mediated through increased learning and knowledge sharing, active participation in care and peer and professional relationship building. Multiparous women and women from diverse cultures sharing their experiences during Circle sessions was particularly valued. Participants had mixed views about including partners in the sessions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Group antenatal care, in the form of Pregnancy Circles, is acceptable to women and appears to enhance their experiences of pregnancy. Further work needs to be done both to test the findings in larger, quantitative studies and to find a model of care that is acceptable to women and their partners.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30253938
pii: S1871-5192(18)30119-7
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.09.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

336-345

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1211-20015
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Louise J Hunter (LJ)

City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, UK. Electronic address: Lhunter@brookes.ac.uk.

Giordana Da Motta (G)

City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, UK.

Christine McCourt (C)

City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, UK.

Octavia Wiseman (O)

City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, UK.

Juliet L Rayment (JL)

City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, UK.

Penny Haora (P)

University of East London, Institute for Health & Human Development, London, UK.

Meg Wiggins (M)

University College London, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London, UK.

Angela Harden (A)

University of East London, Institute for Health & Human Development, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH