Spiral flow-generating tube for saline chaser improves aortic enhancement in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic MRI.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aorta, Abdominal
/ diagnostic imaging
Artifacts
Contrast Media
/ pharmacology
Female
Gadolinium DTPA
/ pharmacology
Hepatic Artery
/ pathology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Liver Diseases
/ diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Saline Solution
/ pharmacology
Contrast media
Liver
Magnetic resonance imaging
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
23
03
2018
accepted:
28
08
2018
revised:
11
08
2018
pubmed:
27
9
2018
medline:
14
5
2019
entrez:
27
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effect of a spiral tube on contrast enhancement in the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this retrospective study, we observed 104 patients who underwent dynamic MRI of the liver between October 2017 and December 2017. Three Gd-EOB-DTPA injection protocols were compared: (A) conventional method (undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA, injection rate 1 ml/s, n = 36); (B) spiral dilution method (1:1 diluted Gd-EOB-DTPA with saline [off-label], injection rate 2 ml/s via spiral tube, n = 38); (C) spiral-flushed method (undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA, injection rate 1 ml/s via spiral tube, n = 30). We regarded protocol-A as a control. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the abdominal aorta was calculated using arterial phase images. Image contrast and artefacts were evaluated by two board-certified radiologists, using a four-point scale. Statistical analyses included Dunnett's test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Steel test. The SNR of the aorta was significantly higher with protocol-C (25.4 ± 8.8) than protocol-A (20.8 ± 5.4, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in SNR between protocols A and B (p = 0.47). The contrast score of protocol-C was significantly higher than that of protocol-A (p = 0.0019). There was no significant difference in contrast score between protocols A and B (p = 0.50). There was no significant difference in artefacts among the three protocols (p = 0.96). Use of a spiral tube with a slow injection protocol contributed to improved aortic contrast enhancement in the HAP of GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic MRI. • Gadoxetic acid shows weaker arterial enhancement at recommended doses, compared with nonspecific gadolinium agents; selection of an appropriate injection protocol is important. • A spiral flow-generating tube improves the transport efficiency of the contrast media, and increases the signal-to-noise ratio of the aorta in hepatic arterial phase. • A spiral flow-generating tube does not contribute to artefact reduction in hepatic arterial phase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30255255
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5733-3
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5733-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Saline Solution
0
gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA
0
Gadolinium DTPA
K2I13DR72L
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2009-2016Références
Radiology. 1995 Jun;195(3):785-92
pubmed: 7754011
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):548-54
pubmed: 23744782
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):516-29
pubmed: 24923695
Vet Rec. 2010 Jan 30;166(5):137-9
pubmed: 20118470
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Aug;32(2):334-40
pubmed: 20677259
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;39(6):962-8
pubmed: 26248150
Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):429-437
pubmed: 27977329
Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):555-62
pubmed: 16170011
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Mar;35(3):492-511
pubmed: 22334493
Invest Radiol. 2005 Nov;40(11):715-24
pubmed: 16230904
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61
pubmed: 20574084
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Mar;73(3):688-93
pubmed: 19349133
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Oct;30(4):849-54
pubmed: 19787734
Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3213-8
pubmed: 23756959
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Feb;31(2):365-72
pubmed: 20099350
Invest Radiol. 2011 Apr;46(4):271-6
pubmed: 21368589
Neuroradiology. 2006 Dec;48(12):935-42
pubmed: 16977442