Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (chemosaturation) with melphalan in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: European multicentre study on safety, short-term effects and survival.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ administration & dosage
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Europe
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Melphalan
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Second Primary
/ drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Chemosaturation
Cholangiocarcinoma
Liver neoplasms
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
02
02
2018
accepted:
27
08
2018
revised:
02
08
2018
pubmed:
27
9
2018
medline:
10
5
2019
entrez:
27
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumour with a poor overall prognosis. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a directed therapy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and its efficacy and safety have been shown in different entities. The purpose of this study was to prove the safety and efficacy of PHP in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). We retrospectively reviewed data from 15 patients with unresectable iCCA treated with PHP in nine different hospitals throughout Europe. Overall response rates (ORR) were assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier estimation. Adverse events (AEs) and toxicity were evaluated. Fifteen patients were treated with 26 PHPs. ORR was 20%, disease control was achieved in 53% after the first PHP. Median OS was 26.9 months from initial diagnosis and 7.6 months from first PHP. Median PFS and hPFS were 122 and 131 days, respectively. Patients with liver-only disease had a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with locoregional lymph node metastases (12.9 vs. 4.8 months, respectively; p < 0.01). Haematological toxicity was common, but manageable. No AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred during the procedures. PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with iCCA, especially in non-metastatic disease. • Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) offers an additional locoregional therapy strategy for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary intrahepatic malignancies. • PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), especially in non-metastatic disease. • Side effects seem to be tolerable and comparable to other systemic or local treatment strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30255257
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5729-z
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5729-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Melphalan
Q41OR9510P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1882-1892Références
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2168-79
pubmed: 24581682
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Aug;24(8):1218-26
pubmed: 23725793
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Jan;19(1):2
pubmed: 28110453
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2017 Jun;34(2):92-100
pubmed: 28579676
Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11(4):312-6
pubmed: 1923913
Int J Cancer. 2012 Aug 1;131(3):733-40
pubmed: 21976289
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;143(10):2113-2121
pubmed: 28634727
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;41(8):747-753
pubmed: 28059929
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;37(3):763-9
pubmed: 24402644
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;109(5):434-9
pubmed: 24249545
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1078-84
pubmed: 22374282
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Apr;36(2):440-8
pubmed: 22956045
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1309-19
pubmed: 26597368
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3465-74
pubmed: 15908655
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Jun;40(6):864-872
pubmed: 28144756
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;111(2):213-20
pubmed: 25176325
Br J Cancer. 2016 Apr 26;114(9):965-71
pubmed: 27115567
Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):755-62
pubmed: 17457168
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;24(4):437-43
pubmed: 22261548
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(4):383-8
pubmed: 24166748
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):120-7
pubmed: 25449754
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Jun;39(6):801-14
pubmed: 26718962
Clin Radiol. 2011 Apr;66(4):322-8
pubmed: 21356394
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W205-9
pubmed: 21257864
Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jun;109(6):764-8
pubmed: 9620037
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;29(2):345-53
pubmed: 25966433
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Feb;35(1):105-16
pubmed: 21431970
Rofo. 2014 Oct;186(10):937-44
pubmed: 24729409
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404