The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: a systematic review.
Endoscopic
Robotic cardiac surgery
Robotically assisted
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
13
08
2018
accepted:
20
09
2018
pubmed:
27
9
2018
medline:
20
6
2019
entrez:
27
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The application of robotic technologies in cardiac surgery has provided the possibility for minimally invasive access inside the thorax and avoidance of a median sternotomy. Given that current evidence seems promising, we sought to systematically review the existing literature regarding the efficacy, feasibility and mortality rate associated with robotic cardiac surgery. The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were thoroughly searched for the following MeSH terms: "robotic", "cardiac surgery" and "heart surgery". Original studies on robotic cardiac surgery in more than ten cases and reporting on the associated peri- or post-operative mortality were deemed eligible. Twenty-eight studies were included and provided data for 5993 patients with a mean age of 59.8 years. Approximately, one out of two patients (49.2%) underwent robotic CABG, while the other half (49.9%) underwent robotic MVR. Robotic atrial septal defect repair and atrial tumor resection were performed in a small proportion (0.9%) of the patients. Mean 30-day mortality was 0.7% ranging from 0 to 0.8% among the different types of surgery, while late mortality was 0.8% ranging from 0 to 1% with a mean follow-up period of 40.1 months. Our findings demonstrate that the application of robotics in cardiac surgery has provided a safe and efficacious alternative to the traditional techniques. However, more trials are necessary to elucidate all of its aspects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30255360
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0875-5
pii: 10.1007/s11701-018-0875-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-52Références
Yanagawa F, Perez M, Bell T et al (2015) Critical outcomes in nonrobotic vs robotic-assisted cardiac surgery. JAMA Surg 150:771–777. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1098
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1098
pubmed: 26083734
Pettinari M, Navarra E, Noirhomme P, Gutermann H (2017) The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.01.02
doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.01.02
pubmed: 28203535
pmcid: 5293627
Wang S, Zhou J, Cai J-F (2014) Traditional coronary artery bypass graft versus totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft or robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft—meta-analysis of 16 studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:790–797
pubmed: 24706301
Seco M, Cao C, Modi P et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:704–716. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.18
pubmed: 24349971
pmcid: 3856985
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.18
de Cannière D, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Cichon R et al (2007) Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.06.057
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.06.057
pubmed: 17723822
Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E et al (2002) Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:1125–1131
doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.121305
pubmed: 12063459
Kappert U, Cichon R, Schneider J et al (2000) Robotic coronary artery surgery—the evolution of a new minimally invasive approach in coronary artery surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-6904
doi: 10.1055/s-2000-6904
pubmed: 11005591
Roubelakis A, Casselman F, van der Merwe J et al (2017) Robotic-enhanced coronary surgery in octogenarians. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 24:384–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw369
pubmed: 28031245
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw369
Jegaden O, Wautot F, Sassard T et al (2011) Is there an optimal minimally invasive technique for left anterior descending coronary artery bypass? J Cardiothorac Surg 6:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-6-37
doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-37
pubmed: 21439055
pmcid: 3076235
Kesävuori R, Raivio P, Jokinen JJ et al (2017) Early experience with robotic mitral valve repair with intra-aortic occlusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.076
pubmed: 29221742
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.076
Navarra E, Mastrobuoni S, De Kerchove L et al (2017) Robotic mitral valve repair: a European single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 25:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx060
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx060
pubmed: 28369386
Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X et al (2006) Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 29:362–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.004
Autschbach R, Onnasch JF, Falk V et al (2000) The Leipzig experience with robotic valve surgery. J Card Surg 15:82–87
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb00447.x
pubmed: 11204392
Bonaros N, Schachner T, Oehlinger A et al (2006) Robotically assisted totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair: insights from operative times, learning curves, and clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 82:687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.024
pubmed: 16863785
Hemli JM, Darla LS, Panetta CR et al (2012) Does body mass index affect outcomes in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass procedures? Innov Phila Pa 7:350–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e31827e1ea9
doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31827e1ea9
Gillinov AM, Mihaljevic T, Javadikasgari H et al (2018) Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: Analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155:82–91.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.037
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.037
pubmed: 28893396
Murphy DA, Moss E, Binongo J et al (2015) The expanding role of endoscopic robotics in mitral valve surgery: 1257 consecutive procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 100:1675–1681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.068 (discussion 1681–1682)
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.068
pubmed: 26296272
Bhamidipati CM, Mehta GS, Sarwar MF et al (2010) Robot-assisted mitral valve repair: a single institution review. Innov Phila Pa 5:295–299. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e3181ed5103
doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3181ed5103
Tatooles AJ, Pappas PS, Gordon PJ, Slaughter MS (2004) Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1978–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.024 (discussion 1982–1984)
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.024
pubmed: 15172249
Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T et al (2003) Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):II191–I194. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000089043.82199.2f
pubmed: 12970231
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000089043.82199.2f
Yang M, Wu Y, Wang G et al (2015) Robotic total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: seven-year single-center experience and long-term follow-up of graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 100:1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.054
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.054
pubmed: 26190391
Gao C, Yang M, Xiao C et al (2012) Robotically assisted mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:S64–S67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.045
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.045
pubmed: 22306218
Gao C, Yang M, Wang G et al (2010) Excision of atrial myxoma using robotic technology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:1282–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.013
pubmed: 19853866
Tarola CL, Al-Amodi HA, Balasubramanian S et al (2017) Ultrafast track robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary artery surgical revascularization. Innov Phila Pa 12:346–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000401
doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000401
Giambruno V, Chu MW, Cucchietti C et al (2018) Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1891
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1891
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A et al (1996) Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III 319:219–223
pubmed: 8761668
Deeba S, Aggarwal R, Sains P et al (2006) Cardiac robotics: a review and St. Mary’s experience. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 2:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.76
doi: 10.1002/rcs.76
Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d’Attellis N et al (1999) Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70133-9
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70133-9
pubmed: 10384177
Whellan DJ, McCarey MM, Taylor BS et al (2016) Trends in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafts: a study of the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database, 2006 to 2012. Ann Thorac Surg 102:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.059
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.059
pubmed: 27016838
Bonatti JO, Zimrin D, Lehr EJ et al (2012) Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results. Ann Thorac Surg 94:1920–1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.041 (discussion 1926)
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.041
pubmed: 23103003
Wiedemann D, Schachner T, Bonaros N et al (2013) Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting in men and women: are there sex differences in outcome? Ann Thorac Surg 96:1643–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.088
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.088
pubmed: 23987901
Hällberg V, Palomäki A, Lahtela J et al (2014) Associations of metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus with 16-year survival after CABG. Cardiovasc Diabetol 13:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-25
doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-25
pubmed: 24447406
pmcid: 3914357
Falk V, Walther T, Autschbach R et al (1998) Robot-assisted minimally invasive solo mitral valve operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:470–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70295-8
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70295-8
pubmed: 9475546
Paul S, Isaacs AJ, Jalbert J et al (2015) A population-based analysis of robotic-assisted mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1546–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.043
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.043
pubmed: 25757763
Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM et al (2011) Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.008 (e1–4)
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.008
pubmed: 21093881
Magruder JT, Collica S, Belmustakov S et al (2016) Predictors of late-onset atrial fibrillation following isolated mitral valve repairs in patients with preserved ejection fraction. J Card Surg 31:486–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12774
doi: 10.1111/jocs.12774
pubmed: 27302368
Nazarov VM, Zheleznev SI, Bogachev-Prokophiev AV et al (2014) CardiaMed mechanical valve: mid-term results of a multicenter clinical trial. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 22:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492312464035
doi: 10.1177/0218492312464035
pubmed: 24585637
Gregers E, Ahlberg G, Christensen T et al (2017) Deep sequencing of atrial fibrillation patients with mitral valve regurgitation shows no evidence of mosaicism but reveals novel rare germline variants. Heart Rhythm 14:1531–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.027
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.027
pubmed: 28549997
Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC et al (2016) Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 374:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1512913
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512913
pubmed: 26550689
Moss E, Halkos ME, Miller JS, Murphy DA (2016) Comparison of endoscopic robotic versus sternotomy approach for the resection of left atrial tumors. Innov Phila Pa 11:274–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000282
doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000282