Comparability of iPad and Web-Based NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery Administration in Veterans.
Assessment
Cognition
Tablet
Telehealth
Toolbox
mHealth
Journal
Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
ISSN: 1873-5843
Titre abrégé: Arch Clin Neuropsychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9004255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2019
01 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
26
02
2018
revised:
01
08
2018
accepted:
08
08
2018
pubmed:
28
9
2018
medline:
3
8
2019
entrez:
28
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparability of National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery test scores across iPad application and web-based personal computer administration platforms. Original test norms were developed using a personal computer-based administration and no previous studies assessing platform comparability have been published. Participants (N = 62; final analyzed sample n = 49) were combat-exposed post-deployment veterans without neurologic disorder, severe mental illness, current substance use disorder, or a history of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. All participants completed both iPad and web-based versions of tests on the same day in an experimental within-subjects crossover design. Standalone validity measures were incorporated to exclude invalid performance. Outcome measures included the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, List Sorting Working Memory Test, and Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. Score differences between platforms were found on the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. Scores were moderately correlated across tests, with the exception of low correlations for the Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. Most participants preferred iPad to web administration, regardless of administration order. Results suggest caution when interpreting iPad-acquired scores, particularly for the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. iPad-based testing offers valuable improvements; however, the development of iPad-specific norms may be necessary to ensure valid interpretation of acquired data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30260372
pii: 5107839
doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy070
pmc: PMC9586718
mid: NIHMS1843198
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
524-530Subventions
Organisme : RRD VA
ID : I01 RX002172
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published by Oxford University Press 2018.
Références
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):413-424
pubmed: 29265862
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 May;21(5):378-91
pubmed: 26030001
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):588-98
pubmed: 24960398
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Apr;15(3):227-41
pubmed: 14590550
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S39-48
pubmed: 17097851
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):496-508
pubmed: 29265870
Theriogenology. 2010 Jun;73(9):1167-79
pubmed: 20138353
Stat Methods Med Res. 1994 Dec;3(4):345-81
pubmed: 7889227
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug 1;32(5):541-554
pubmed: 28541383
Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68
pubmed: 2720055
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S2-6
pubmed: 23479538
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S54-64
pubmed: 23479546
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):443-454
pubmed: 29265865
Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Jun;27(2):174-186
pubmed: 28623461
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(2):177-96
pubmed: 22394228
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):435-442
pubmed: 29265864
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):567-78
pubmed: 24959840
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug 01;32(5):555-573
pubmed: 28334392
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;25(7):1119-33
pubmed: 21951075